Comparison Overview

National Space Centre

VS

George C. Marshall Foundation

National Space Centre

Exploration Drive, Leicester, Leicestershire, GB, LE4 5NS
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799

The National Space Centre is a visitor attraction, education facility, corporate venue, and home to NSC Creative and the National Space Academy. Set in the heart of the UK, the Centre welcomes around 300,000 visitors a year through the doors. These include family visitors, school children on National Curriculum visits, corporate hire visitors, media and partners from the UK and worldwide space communities. The Centre opened to the public in 2001 and since this date has focused on developing in an ever changing environment to educate, entertain and inspire. The facilities for corporate and educational guests includes the Sir Patrick Moore Planetarium, the UK's largest. The National Space Centre has a selection of award-winning shows for educational and family visitors to enjoy from the world-leading fulldome show producers, NSC Creative.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

George C. Marshall Foundation

340 VMI Parade Ground, Lexington, VA, 24450, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

George C. Marshall was a man of towering stature whose contributions to our nation and the world cannot be overstated. His characteristics of honesty, integrity, and selfless service stand as shining examples for those who study the past and for those generations to come. The Marshall Foundation is dedicated to celebrating his legacy and inspiring new leaders. The independent Marshall Foundation perpetuates Marshall’s legacy through scholarship, leadership and statesmanship programs and facilities (including a museum and research library) that offer a wide range of resources and materials for use by the general public, amateur historians, scholars and students of all ages.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-space-centre.jpeg
National Space Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-c-marshall-foundation.jpeg
George C. Marshall Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Space Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
George C. Marshall Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Space Centre in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for George C. Marshall Foundation in 2026.

Incident History — National Space Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Space Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — George C. Marshall Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

George C. Marshall Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-space-centre.jpeg
National Space Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/george-c-marshall-foundation.jpeg
George C. Marshall Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Space Centre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to George C. Marshall Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, George C. Marshall Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Space Centre company.

In the current year, George C. Marshall Foundation company and National Space Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation company nor National Space Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation company nor National Space Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither George C. Marshall Foundation company nor National Space Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Space Centre company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Space Centre nor George C. Marshall Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Space Centre company nor George C. Marshall Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Space Centre company employs more people globally than George C. Marshall Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Space Centre nor George C. Marshall Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor George C. Marshall Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor George C. Marshall Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor George C. Marshall Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor George C. Marshall Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor George C. Marshall Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H