Comparison Overview

National Space Centre

VS

Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site

National Space Centre

Exploration Drive, Leicester, Leicestershire, GB, LE4 5NS
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spacecentre.co.uk

The National Space Centre is a visitor attraction, education facility, corporate venue, and home to NSC Creative and the National Space Academy. Set in the heart of the UK, the Centre welcomes around 300,000 visitors a year through the doors. These include family visitors, school children on National Curriculum visits, corporate hire visitors, media and partners from the UK and worldwide space communities. The Centre opened to the public in 2001 and since this date has focused on developing in an ever changing environment to educate, entertain and inspire. The facilities for corporate and educational guests includes the Sir Patrick Moore Planetarium, the UK's largest. The National Space Centre has a selection of award-winning shows for educational and family visitors to enjoy from the world-leading fulldome show producers, NSC Creative.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 121
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site

14520 River Rd, Plano, Illinois, 60545, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
https://edithfarnsworthhouse.org/

Designed by Mies van der Rohe in 1945 and constructed in 1951, the Farnsworth House is a vital part of American iconography, an exemplary representation of both the International Style of architecture as well as the modern movement’s desire to juxtapose the sleek, streamline design of Modern structure with the organic environment of the surrounding nature. Mies constructed this glass box residence of “almost nothing” for Dr. Edith Farnsworth as a country retreat along the Fox River in Plano, IL. It continued to be a private residence for over 50 years until Landmarks Illinois and the National Trust for Historic Preservation purchased it in 2003. Today it is owned and managed by the Trust and the site is open as a public museum. See what's happening - https://linktr.ee/farnsworthhouse

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-space-centre.jpeg
National Space Centre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farnsworth-house.jpeg
Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Space Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Space Centre in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site in 2025.

Incident History — National Space Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Space Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-space-centre.jpeg
National Space Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/farnsworth-house.jpeg
Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Space Centre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Space Centre company.

In the current year, Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company and National Space Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company nor National Space Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company nor National Space Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company nor National Space Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Space Centre company nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Space Centre nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Space Centre company nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Space Centre company employs more people globally than Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Space Centre nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Space Centre nor Edith Farnsworth House, a National Trust for Historic Preservation Historic Site holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References