Comparison Overview

National Music Centre

VS

EXARC

National Music Centre

850 4 Street SE , Calgary, Alberta, T2G 1R1, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.studiobell.ca

National Music Centre | Centre National de Musique gives Canada a place that amplifies the love, the sharing and the understanding of music through collections that serve as a foundation for public education programs, presenting performances, the development of new music and fostering partnerships across the Canadian musical spectrum. Mission To give Canada a place that amplifies the love, the sharing and the understanding of music. Vision To be a national catalyst for discovery, innovation and renewal through music.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 72
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

EXARC

Aloelaan 40A, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, 2316XT, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://exarc.net

EXARC is the international ICOM Affiliated organisation of Archaeological Open-Air Museums and Experimental Archaeology. It is our aim to establish a high standard of both scientific research and public presentation. The idea of international exchange of knowledge, human resources, publications and facsimiles is to improve the quality of work for all associated members.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-music-centre.jpeg
National Music Centre
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exarc.jpeg
EXARC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Music Centre
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EXARC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Music Centre in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EXARC in 2026.

Incident History — National Music Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Music Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EXARC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EXARC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-music-centre.jpeg
National Music Centre
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exarc.jpeg
EXARC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Music Centre company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EXARC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, EXARC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Music Centre company.

In the current year, EXARC company and National Music Centre company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither EXARC company nor National Music Centre company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither EXARC company nor National Music Centre company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither EXARC company nor National Music Centre company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Music Centre company nor EXARC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Music Centre nor EXARC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Music Centre company nor EXARC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Music Centre company employs more people globally than EXARC company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Music Centre nor EXARC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Music Centre nor EXARC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Music Centre nor EXARC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Music Centre nor EXARC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Music Centre nor EXARC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Music Centre nor EXARC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References