Comparison Overview

National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe

VS

British Motor Museum

National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe

107 Rotten Row, Harare, Harare, ZW
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

The National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe (NMMZ ) is Zimbabwe's premier heritage organization established under an Act of Parliament; The National Museums and Monuments of Rhodesia Act (1972) which is now called the National Museums and Monuments Act (Chapter 25:11). NMMZ is a Parastatal, funded through grant by Central Government and falling under the Ministry of Home Affairs and Cultural Heritage. The Act established a Board of Trustees to provide for the establishment and administration of museums and to provide for the preservation of ancient, historical and natural monuments, relics and other objects of historical or scientific value or interest

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 93
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

British Motor Museum

Banbury Road, Gaydon, Warwickshire, CV35 0BJ, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The British Motor Museum is home to the world’s largest collection of historic British cars. But we are more than just a Museum… …we are one of the largest and most impressive venues in Warwickshire for meetings, exhibitions and weddings and winner of the 'Best Independent Venue' CHS Award 2021 . From the iconic design of the building to the variety of diverse spaces you will be sure to inspire your guests. So whether you are looking to hold an a small meeting or an event for 600, our flexible space will be able to accommodate your requirements. For more information about the Museum visit our website www.britishmotormuseum.co.uk e: [email protected] t: 01926 895295

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-museums-and-monuments-of-zimbabwe.jpeg
National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/britishmotormuseum.jpeg
British Motor Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
British Motor Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for British Motor Museum in 2026.

Incident History — National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — British Motor Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

British Motor Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-museums-and-monuments-of-zimbabwe.jpeg
National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/britishmotormuseum.jpeg
British Motor Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to British Motor Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, British Motor Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe company.

In the current year, British Motor Museum company and National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither British Motor Museum company nor National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither British Motor Museum company nor National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither British Motor Museum company nor National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe company nor British Motor Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe nor British Motor Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe company nor British Motor Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe company employs more people globally than British Motor Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe nor British Motor Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe nor British Motor Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe nor British Motor Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe nor British Motor Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe nor British Motor Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Museums and Monuments of Zimbabwe nor British Motor Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H