Comparison Overview

National Museum of Ireland

VS

Design Museum Gent

National Museum of Ireland

National Museum of Ireland- Decorative Arts & History, Collins Barracks, Benburb St. , Dublin 7, IE, D07 XKV4
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.museum.ie

The National Museum of Ireland is a leader in preserving and promoting Ireland’s heritage across the island and the world. We contribute to the collective memory and identity of all people with Irish connections, nationally and internationally, through our collections and programmes. We welcome over one million visitors annually to our four museums, providing opportunities to be inspired, engaged and informed through inclusive and accessible events and public programmes.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Design Museum Gent

Jan Breydelstraat 5, Gent, 9000, BE
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.designmuseumgent.be

Het museum is het enige designmuseum in België. Het museumcomplex, gelegen in de historische stads­­­­­­kern, bestaat uit een statig 18de-eeuws herenhuis en een moderne vleugel. Het bezit een omvangrijke en toonaangevende collectie Belgisch design ondersteund door internationale topstukken. De verzameling vangt aan met de art nouveau van Henry Van de Velde en gaat tot de avantgarde vormgeving van nu. Aan de hand van spraakmakende tentoonstellingen en wisselende collectiepresentaties biedt het museum een verrassende kijk op modern en actueel design van 1890 tot vandaag.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 36
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-museum-of-ireland.jpeg
National Museum of Ireland
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-museum-gent.jpeg
Design Museum Gent
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Museum of Ireland
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Design Museum Gent
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Museum of Ireland in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Design Museum Gent in 2026.

Incident History — National Museum of Ireland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Museum of Ireland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Design Museum Gent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Design Museum Gent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-museum-of-ireland.jpeg
National Museum of Ireland
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/design-museum-gent.jpeg
Design Museum Gent
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Museum of Ireland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Design Museum Gent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Design Museum Gent company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Museum of Ireland company.

In the current year, Design Museum Gent company and National Museum of Ireland company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Design Museum Gent company nor National Museum of Ireland company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Design Museum Gent company nor National Museum of Ireland company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Design Museum Gent company nor National Museum of Ireland company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Museum of Ireland company nor Design Museum Gent company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Museum of Ireland nor Design Museum Gent holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Museum of Ireland company nor Design Museum Gent company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Museum of Ireland company employs more people globally than Design Museum Gent company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Museum of Ireland nor Design Museum Gent holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Museum of Ireland nor Design Museum Gent holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Museum of Ireland nor Design Museum Gent holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Museum of Ireland nor Design Museum Gent holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Museum of Ireland nor Design Museum Gent holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Museum of Ireland nor Design Museum Gent holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References