Comparison Overview

National Museum of African American Music

VS

Minnesota Zoo

National Museum of African American Music

510 Broadway, Nashville, Tennessee, 37203, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

As the only museum dedicated to all dimensions of African American music, The National Museum of African American Music (NMAAM) will showcase over 50 music genres created or impacted by African Americans, honor the legacy and legends of this diverse music and detail the impact this music has on musicians and consumers around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 35
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Minnesota Zoo

Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Created by the State of Minnesota, the Minnesota Zoo opened in 1978 with a mission to connect people, animals, and the natural world to save wildlife. Cutting-edge exhibits provide exciting experiences with animals and their habitats introducing guests to species from around the globe. Education programs engage audiences at the Zoo, throughout the region, and around world. Conservation programs protect endangered species and preserve critical ecosystems. Learn more about the Minnesota Zoo—our mission, leadership, and history.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 197
Subsidiaries: 58
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-museum-of-african-american-music.jpeg
National Museum of African American Music
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-zoo.jpeg
Minnesota Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Museum of African American Music
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Minnesota Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Museum of African American Music in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minnesota Zoo in 2025.

Incident History — National Museum of African American Music (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Museum of African American Music cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Minnesota Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minnesota Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-museum-of-african-american-music.jpeg
National Museum of African American Music
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/minnesota-zoo.jpeg
Minnesota Zoo
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Human Error
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Minnesota Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Museum of African American Music company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Minnesota Zoo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas National Museum of African American Music company has not reported any.

In the current year, Minnesota Zoo company and National Museum of African American Music company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Minnesota Zoo company nor National Museum of African American Music company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Minnesota Zoo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while National Museum of African American Music company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Minnesota Zoo company nor National Museum of African American Music company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Minnesota Zoo company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while National Museum of African American Music company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither National Museum of African American Music nor Minnesota Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Minnesota Zoo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to National Museum of African American Music company.

Minnesota Zoo company employs more people globally than National Museum of African American Music company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Museum of African American Music nor Minnesota Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Museum of African American Music nor Minnesota Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Museum of African American Music nor Minnesota Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Museum of African American Music nor Minnesota Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Museum of African American Music nor Minnesota Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Museum of African American Music nor Minnesota Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X