Comparison Overview

National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc.

VS

Center for a New American Security (CNAS)

National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc.

3274 Mount Gilead Rd SW, Atlanta, Georgia, 30311, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.njcdlp.online

National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. (NJCDLP), also known as "The Law Project", is the leading epidemiologist of sorts on the constitutional and human rights crisis of organized U.S. legal system abuse. We understand the problems, which is why we recognize the solutions. NJCDLP is an average citizen-centric good government advocate, equitably harnessing relevant insights from ALL major stakeholder groups in the proper operation of America's legal system to help ensure an appropriate balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability as well as a fair and impartial administration of justice throughout the nation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Center for a New American Security (CNAS)

1152 15th Street NW, Washington, DC, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cnas.org

The Center for a New American Security (CNAS) is an independent, bipartisan, nonprofit organization that develops strong, pragmatic, and principled national security and defense policies. CNAS engages policymakers, experts, and the public with innovative, fact-based research, ideas, and analysis to shape and elevate the national security debate. A key part of our mission is to inform and prepare the national security leaders of today and tomorrow. CNAS is located in Washington and was established in 2007 by co-founders Dr. Kurt M. Campbell and Michèle A. Flournoy. Since the Center’s founding, our work has informed key U.S. strategic choices and has been acted on by Republican and Democratic leaders in the executive branch and on Capitol Hill.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 179
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-judicial-conduct-and-disability-law-project-inc-.jpeg
National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-a-new-american-security.jpeg
Center for a New American Security (CNAS)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for a New American Security (CNAS)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for a New American Security (CNAS) in 2025.

Incident History — National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for a New American Security (CNAS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for a New American Security (CNAS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-judicial-conduct-and-disability-law-project-inc-.jpeg
National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-a-new-american-security.jpeg
Center for a New American Security (CNAS)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Center for a New American Security (CNAS) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Center for a New American Security (CNAS) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. company.

In the current year, Center for a New American Security (CNAS) company and National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for a New American Security (CNAS) company nor National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for a New American Security (CNAS) company nor National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for a New American Security (CNAS) company nor National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. company nor Center for a New American Security (CNAS) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. nor Center for a New American Security (CNAS) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. company nor Center for a New American Security (CNAS) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for a New American Security (CNAS) company employs more people globally than National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. nor Center for a New American Security (CNAS) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. nor Center for a New American Security (CNAS) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. nor Center for a New American Security (CNAS) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. nor Center for a New American Security (CNAS) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. nor Center for a New American Security (CNAS) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Judicial Conduct and Disability Law Project, Inc. nor Center for a New American Security (CNAS) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References