Comparison Overview

National Infantry Museum Foundation

VS

National Gallery of Ireland

National Infantry Museum Foundation

1775 Legacy Way, Columbus, GA, 31903, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

THE MISSION The National Infantry Museum and Soldier Center opened in 2009 with one guiding mission: to honor the legacy and valor of the U.S. Army Infantryman. EDUCATION Telling the story of our nation’s past with the latest in technological innovation. Customizable tour packages available for students of all ages, servicemembers, church groups, scouts, military reunions and more. PRESERVATION In addition to more than 70,000 artifacts, the museum campus is also home to World War II Company Street, Vietnam Memorial Plaza – featuring the Dignity Memorial Vietnam Wall – and the Global War on Terrorism Memorial. ATTRACTIONS Offering the best opportunities for patriotic family fun, visitors can enjoy films on Giant Screen Theater, Combat Simulators, the Fife & Drum Restaurant and Bar, and a wide variety of annual community-wide events!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Gallery of Ireland

Merrion Square West, Dublin 2, IE
Last Update: 2026-01-21

The National Gallery of Ireland is located in the heart of Dublin, and holds the national collection of European and Irish fine art. Founded in 1854, the National Gallery of Ireland first opened its doors in 1864, and over the last 150 years, the Gallery's collection has grown from one hundred artworks to over 15,000 paintings, works on paper, sculptures, objets d’art, silver and furniture, with an additional 100,000 items in the Library and Archive collections. The Gallery is open 362 days of the year, and admission to the permanent collection is free.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 135
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-infantry-museum-foundation.jpeg
National Infantry Museum Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Infantry Museum Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Gallery of Ireland
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Infantry Museum Foundation in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Gallery of Ireland in 2026.

Incident History — National Infantry Museum Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Infantry Museum Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Gallery of Ireland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Gallery of Ireland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-infantry-museum-foundation.jpeg
National Infantry Museum Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-gallery-of-ireland.jpeg
National Gallery of Ireland
Incidents

FAQ

National Gallery of Ireland company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Infantry Museum Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Gallery of Ireland company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Infantry Museum Foundation company.

In the current year, National Gallery of Ireland company and National Infantry Museum Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Gallery of Ireland company nor National Infantry Museum Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Gallery of Ireland company nor National Infantry Museum Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Gallery of Ireland company nor National Infantry Museum Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Infantry Museum Foundation company nor National Gallery of Ireland company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Infantry Museum Foundation nor National Gallery of Ireland holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Infantry Museum Foundation company nor National Gallery of Ireland company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Gallery of Ireland company employs more people globally than National Infantry Museum Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Infantry Museum Foundation nor National Gallery of Ireland holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Infantry Museum Foundation nor National Gallery of Ireland holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Infantry Museum Foundation nor National Gallery of Ireland holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Infantry Museum Foundation nor National Gallery of Ireland holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Infantry Museum Foundation nor National Gallery of Ireland holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Infantry Museum Foundation nor National Gallery of Ireland holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N