Comparison Overview

National Heritage Board

VS

Seattle Art Museum

National Heritage Board

61 Stamford Road, Singapore, 268359, SG
Last Update: 2025-12-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nhb.gov.sg

As the custodian of Singapore’s heritage, the National Heritage Board (NHB) is responsible for telling the Singapore story, sharing the Singaporean experience and imparting our Singapore spirit. NHB’s mission is to preserve and celebrate the shared heritage of our diverse communities, for the purpose of education, nation-building and cultural understanding. It manages the national museums and heritage institutions, and sets policies relating to heritage sites, monuments and the National Collection. Through the National Collection, NHB curates heritage programmes and presents exhibitions to connect the past, present and future generations of Singaporeans. NHB was formed on 1 August 1993, and is a statutory board under the Ministry of Culture, Community and Youth.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 413
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Seattle Art Museum

1300 First Avenue, Seattle, WA, 98101, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.seattleartmuseum.org

For over 90 years, the Seattle Art Museum (SAM) has been a leading visual arts institution in the Pacific Northwest. Through its three locations — the Seattle Art Museum in downtown Seattle, the Seattle Asian Art Museum in Volunteer Park, and the Olympic Sculpture Park on the downtown waterfront — SAM connects art to life through special exhibitions, educational programs, and installations drawn from its collection of approximately 25,000 objects from more than 140 cultures. SAM Social Media Policy: bit.ly/SAMSocialMediaPolicy.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 353
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-heritage-board.jpeg
National Heritage Board
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle-art-museum.jpeg
Seattle Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Heritage Board
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seattle Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Heritage Board in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seattle Art Museum in 2025.

Incident History — National Heritage Board (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Heritage Board cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seattle Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seattle Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-heritage-board.jpeg
National Heritage Board
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seattle-art-museum.jpeg
Seattle Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both National Heritage Board company and Seattle Art Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Seattle Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Heritage Board company.

In the current year, Seattle Art Museum company and National Heritage Board company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seattle Art Museum company nor National Heritage Board company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seattle Art Museum company nor National Heritage Board company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seattle Art Museum company nor National Heritage Board company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Heritage Board company nor Seattle Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Heritage Board nor Seattle Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Heritage Board company nor Seattle Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Heritage Board company employs more people globally than Seattle Art Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Heritage Board nor Seattle Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Heritage Board nor Seattle Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Heritage Board nor Seattle Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Heritage Board nor Seattle Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Heritage Board nor Seattle Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Heritage Board nor Seattle Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References