Comparison Overview

National Health Care for the Homeless Council

VS

AFL Enterprises

National Health Care for the Homeless Council

100 Powell Pl, #1558, Nashville, Tennessee, US, 37204
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nhchc.org

The National Health Care for the Homeless Council is the premier national organization working at the nexus of homelessness and health care. Grounded in human rights and social justice, the NHCHC mission is to build an equitable, high-quality health care system through training, research, and advocacy in the movement to end homelessness. We work to improve health care for people experiencing homelessness through training and technical assistance, researching and sharing best practices, advocating for real solutions to end homelessness, and uplifting voices of people experiencing homelessness. Many of our members are Health Care for the Homeless programs, which deliver direct health care and support services to unhoused people. To learn more about HCH programs, read our fact sheet.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

AFL Enterprises

undefined, Denver, CO, 80238, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799
http://afl.enterprises/

SBA Certified 8 (a), WOSB. AFL Enterprises, LLC, is a public health project planning, implementation, and management company. AFL works with organizations to test and implement new ideas and find efficiencies in their work. We also support organizations by instructing health care providers and informing them about current, evidence-based best practices, recent innovations, and areas for growth and research in the field of public health. Interested in learning more about what AFL can do for you? Give us a call at 1.720.439.9732‬ or email us at [email protected].

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-health-care-for-the-homeless-council.jpeg
National Health Care for the Homeless Council
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afl-enterprises.jpeg
AFL Enterprises
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Health Care for the Homeless Council
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AFL Enterprises
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Health Care for the Homeless Council in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AFL Enterprises in 2025.

Incident History — National Health Care for the Homeless Council (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Health Care for the Homeless Council cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AFL Enterprises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AFL Enterprises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-health-care-for-the-homeless-council.jpeg
National Health Care for the Homeless Council
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/afl-enterprises.jpeg
AFL Enterprises
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AFL Enterprises company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Health Care for the Homeless Council company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AFL Enterprises company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Health Care for the Homeless Council company.

In the current year, AFL Enterprises company and National Health Care for the Homeless Council company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AFL Enterprises company nor National Health Care for the Homeless Council company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AFL Enterprises company nor National Health Care for the Homeless Council company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AFL Enterprises company nor National Health Care for the Homeless Council company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Health Care for the Homeless Council company nor AFL Enterprises company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Health Care for the Homeless Council nor AFL Enterprises holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Health Care for the Homeless Council company nor AFL Enterprises company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Health Care for the Homeless Council company employs more people globally than AFL Enterprises company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither National Health Care for the Homeless Council nor AFL Enterprises holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Health Care for the Homeless Council nor AFL Enterprises holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Health Care for the Homeless Council nor AFL Enterprises holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Health Care for the Homeless Council nor AFL Enterprises holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Health Care for the Homeless Council nor AFL Enterprises holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Health Care for the Homeless Council nor AFL Enterprises holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References