Comparison Overview

National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association

VS

Liberty Institute

National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association

1220 L Street, NW, Washington, DC, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1985 by several private health insurers and federal and state government officials, the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association is the leading national organization focused exclusively on the fight against health care fraud. We are a private-public partnership — our members comprise more than 100 private health insurers and those public-sector law enforcement and regulatory agencies having jurisdiction over health care fraud committed against both private payers and public programs. Established in 2000, The NHCAA Institute for Health Care Fraud Prevention is a separately incorporated, tax-exempt educational foundation that provides education and training to private- and public-sector health care anti-fraud personnel. Mission Statement: To protect and serve the public interest by increasing awareness and improving the detection, investigation, civil and criminal prosecution and prevention of health care fraud. Join the fight against health care fraud! Please visit http://www.nhcaa.org or call 202.659.5955 for more information about membership.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 25
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Liberty Institute

5 Shalva Radiani Street, Tbilisi, Tbilisi, 0179, GE
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

Liberty Institute is Georgian research and advocacy organization that advances natural law and liberty. We aim not only to analyze and comment on public policy but to change it. We provide not just an academic forum for critical discussions and debates but strive to act as catalyst of reforms. Combining analysis, advocacy, and action, we generate path-breaking ideas on wide spectrum of public policy issues.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-health-care-anti-fraud-association.jpeg
National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liberty-institute.jpeg
Liberty Institute
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Liberty Institute
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Liberty Institute in 2025.

Incident History — National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Liberty Institute (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Liberty Institute cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-health-care-anti-fraud-association.jpeg
National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/liberty-institute.jpeg
Liberty Institute
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Liberty Institute company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Liberty Institute company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association company.

In the current year, Liberty Institute company and National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Liberty Institute company nor National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Liberty Institute company nor National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Liberty Institute company nor National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association company nor Liberty Institute company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association nor Liberty Institute holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association company nor Liberty Institute company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association company employs more people globally than Liberty Institute company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association nor Liberty Institute holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association nor Liberty Institute holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association nor Liberty Institute holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association nor Liberty Institute holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association nor Liberty Institute holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association nor Liberty Institute holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H