Comparison Overview

National EAP, Inc.

VS

The Women's Center

National EAP, Inc.

490 WHEELER RD, Hauppauge, 11788, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1982 as Long Island’s pioneer Employee Assistance Provider (EAP), National EAP offers a vast array of comprehensive Employee Assistance Programs and organizational services to address workplace behavior for clients in Long Island, New York and around the globe. As the largest private EAP headquartered on Long Island, our team of EAP specialists are highly trained in assessing organizational management and employee issues and delivering confidential, effective solutions to develop and maintain a healthy and thriving workforce. Our clinicians are available 24/7/365 to provide unparalleled support and problem-solving strategies for workplace performance issues, critical incidents and organizational concerns. Through our customized EAP support programs and HR & Management consultation services, we keep clients satisfied by helping them minimize their potential liabilities and risks, and maximize the productivity of their most valuable asset — their employees.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Women's Center

8230 Old Courthouse Road, Vienna, VA, 22182, US
Last Update:

Founded in 1974, The Women’s Center is a unique service provider dedicated to significantly improving the well-being of individuals and families in the Washington DC region. We offer counseling, education, and support services to help clients transition through times of personal challenge so they can go on to live healthy, stable lives. Our two locations – Vienna, VA and Washington, DC – offer compassionate, comprehensive services to ensure that clients from all walks of life can receive a high level of care, regardless of their ability to pay. Each year, The Women’s Center works with thousands of men, women, teens, and children through our wide range of services. The Center provides a sliding fee scale to maintain accessibility to those in need, no matter their financial situation. No matter how wide our range of services become, our core is focused the person in need of counseling and support.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 398
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-eap-inc-.jpeg
National EAP, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-women's-center.jpeg
The Women's Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National EAP, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Women's Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National EAP, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Women's Center in 2026.

Incident History — National EAP, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National EAP, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Women's Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Women's Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-eap-inc-.jpeg
National EAP, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-women's-center.jpeg
The Women's Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Women's Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National EAP, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Women's Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National EAP, Inc. company.

In the current year, The Women's Center company and National EAP, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Women's Center company nor National EAP, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Women's Center company nor National EAP, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Women's Center company nor National EAP, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National EAP, Inc. company nor The Women's Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National EAP, Inc. nor The Women's Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National EAP, Inc. company nor The Women's Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Women's Center company employs more people globally than National EAP, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither National EAP, Inc. nor The Women's Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National EAP, Inc. nor The Women's Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National EAP, Inc. nor The Women's Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National EAP, Inc. nor The Women's Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National EAP, Inc. nor The Women's Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National EAP, Inc. nor The Women's Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N