Comparison Overview

National Council on Teacher Quality

VS

Rose Regeneration

National Council on Teacher Quality

1120 G Street NW, Suite 800, WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.nctq.org/

The National Council on Teacher Quality advocates for reforms in a broad range of teacher policies at the federal, state and local levels in order to increase the number of effective teachers. In particular, we recognize the absence of much of the evidence necessary to make a compelling case for change and seek to fill that void with a research agenda that has direct and practical implications for policy. We are committed to lending transparency and increasing public awareness about the four sets of institutions that have the greatest impact on teacher quality: states, teacher preparation programs, school districts, and teachers unions.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rose Regeneration

Beaumont Fee, Lincoln, England LN1 1UH, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
https://roseregeneration.co.uk/

We are an economic development business. We work with communities, government and businesses to help them achieve their full potential. We believe in the power of collaboration to create lasting, positive change. We are guided by integrity and transparency. We design impactful projects that strengthen communities, influence policy, and foster business partnerships. Our Social Value Engine simplifies measuring social impact, ensuring every project builds a more connected, resilient future. We are more than consultants. We are partners in regeneration, committed to helping communities thrive.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-council-on-teacher-quality.jpeg
National Council on Teacher Quality
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rose-regeneration-limited.jpeg
Rose Regeneration
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Council on Teacher Quality
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rose Regeneration
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Council on Teacher Quality in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rose Regeneration in 2025.

Incident History — National Council on Teacher Quality (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Council on Teacher Quality cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rose Regeneration (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rose Regeneration cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-council-on-teacher-quality.jpeg
National Council on Teacher Quality
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rose-regeneration-limited.jpeg
Rose Regeneration
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both National Council on Teacher Quality company and Rose Regeneration company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Rose Regeneration company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Council on Teacher Quality company.

In the current year, Rose Regeneration company and National Council on Teacher Quality company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rose Regeneration company nor National Council on Teacher Quality company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rose Regeneration company nor National Council on Teacher Quality company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rose Regeneration company nor National Council on Teacher Quality company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Council on Teacher Quality company nor Rose Regeneration company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Council on Teacher Quality nor Rose Regeneration holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Council on Teacher Quality company nor Rose Regeneration company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Council on Teacher Quality company employs more people globally than Rose Regeneration company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither National Council on Teacher Quality nor Rose Regeneration holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Council on Teacher Quality nor Rose Regeneration holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Council on Teacher Quality nor Rose Regeneration holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Council on Teacher Quality nor Rose Regeneration holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Council on Teacher Quality nor Rose Regeneration holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Council on Teacher Quality nor Rose Regeneration holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References