Comparison Overview

National Committee on North Korea

VS

CEA Tech

National Committee on North Korea

1111 19th St. NW, Suite 650, Washington, DC, US, 20002
Last Update: 2025-12-05
Between 700 and 749

The National Committee on North Korea (NCNK) is a non-governmental organization of persons with significant and diverse expertise related to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. NCNK and its members support principled engagement with North Korea as a means to promote peace and stability on the Korean Peninsula and to improve the lives of the people of North Korea. NCNK also works to provide policymakers, the academic and think tank community, and the general public with substantive and balanced information about developments in North Korea. NCNK was founded by Mercy Corps, a global aid and development organization, in 2004.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

CEA Tech

17 avenue des Martyrs, Grenoble, 38000, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

At CEA Tech we feel strongly that technology research is a crucial component of both innovation and value creation. It is this belief that has driven our successful technology development activities over the past 50 years. CEA Tech is the CEA’s (the French Atomic Energy and Alternative Energy Commission) technology research unit. CEA Tech’s three labs—Leti, Liten, and List—develop a broad portfolio of technologies for ICTs, energy, and healthcare. CEA Tech leverages a unique innovation-driven culture and unrivalled expertise to develop and disseminate new technologies for industry, effectively bridging the gap between the worlds of research and business. CEA Tech also provides businesses with access to Key Enabling Technologies developed by other CEA operating divisions.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 204
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-committee-on-north-korea.jpeg
National Committee on North Korea
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cea-tech.jpeg
CEA Tech
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Committee on North Korea
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CEA Tech
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

National Committee on North Korea has 0.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEA Tech in 2025.

Incident History — National Committee on North Korea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Committee on North Korea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CEA Tech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEA Tech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-committee-on-north-korea.jpeg
National Committee on North Korea
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cea-tech.jpeg
CEA Tech
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CEA Tech company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Committee on North Korea company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

National Committee on North Korea company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CEA Tech company has not reported any.

In the current year, National Committee on North Korea company has reported more cyber incidents than CEA Tech company.

Neither CEA Tech company nor National Committee on North Korea company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CEA Tech company nor National Committee on North Korea company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

National Committee on North Korea company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while CEA Tech company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither National Committee on North Korea company nor CEA Tech company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Committee on North Korea nor CEA Tech holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CEA Tech company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to National Committee on North Korea company.

CEA Tech company employs more people globally than National Committee on North Korea company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither National Committee on North Korea nor CEA Tech holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Committee on North Korea nor CEA Tech holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Committee on North Korea nor CEA Tech holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Committee on North Korea nor CEA Tech holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Committee on North Korea nor CEA Tech holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Committee on North Korea nor CEA Tech holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X