Comparison Overview

National Center for Science Education

VS

Save the Harbor/Save the Bay

National Center for Science Education

230 Grand Ave, Oakland, California, 94610, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://ncse.ngo

NCSE promotes and defends accurate and effective science education, because everyone deserves to engage with the evidence. For over 40 years the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) has worked to ensure evidence-based science is taught in public school science classrooms. Focused initially on preventing creationism from being taught alongside or instead of evolution, the organization added climate change to its mission in 2012 when it became clear that politicization of the topic was affecting how it was being taught. NCSE is unique in its recognition that societally, but not scientifically, controversial topics are challenging to teach. For these topics, accuracy alone is not enough to change minds. NCSE helps train teachers and community volunteers in proven approaches that are effective in helping learners overcome even deeply held misconceptions. NCSE played a key role in several crucial legal battles that affirmed teaching creationism in public schools is unconstitutional and continues to help local communities block legislation and other efforts allowing or encouraging teachers to miseducate students on these critical topics.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Save the Harbor/Save the Bay

212 Northern Ave, Boston, MA, 02210, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
http://www.savetheharbor.org/

Save the Harbor/Save the Bay is a non-profit, public interest, environmental advocacy organization made up of thousands of citizens, as well as scientists and civic, corporate, cultural, and community leaders, whose shared mission is to restore and protect Boston Harbor and Massachusetts Bay and share them with the public for everyone to enjoy. Since 1986 we have been the region’s leading voice for clean water and the completion of the $4.5 billion Boston Harbor Clean-Up, which has transformed Boston Harbor from one of the dirtiest harbors in the nation into a source of educational, recreational and economic opportunity for all Bostonians and the region’s residents. Though clean water and environmental advocacy remain at the core of our mission, since 2001 Save the Harbor/Save the Bay has increasingly focused our attention on finding new ways to connect the nearly one million residents who live within half an hour of the coast, with the harbor, the beaches, and the islands. • Over the past dozen years Save the Harbor has pioneered a suite of free, harbor-focused youth education and recreation programs that have become the largest in the region, connecting 15,000 Boston area youth and teens each year to Boston Harbor and the Harbor Islands, opening up new opportunities for corporate sponsorships and cause-related marketing partnerships. • Each year Save the Harbor hosts or supports 30 free, family-friendly events and activities on the region’s public beaches that connect the region’s youth and families to the harbor. In 2013 these free events attracted a large and extraordinarily diverse audience of more than 500,000 people to the region’s public beaches from Nahant to Nantasket, opening up new opportunities for corporate sponsorships and related marketing partnerships.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 31
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-center-for-science-education.jpeg
National Center for Science Education
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/save-the-harbor-save-the-bay.jpeg
Save the Harbor/Save the Bay
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Center for Science Education
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Save the Harbor/Save the Bay
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Center for Science Education in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Save the Harbor/Save the Bay in 2025.

Incident History — National Center for Science Education (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Center for Science Education cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Save the Harbor/Save the Bay (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Save the Harbor/Save the Bay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-center-for-science-education.jpeg
National Center for Science Education
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/save-the-harbor-save-the-bay.jpeg
Save the Harbor/Save the Bay
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Save the Harbor/Save the Bay company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Center for Science Education company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Save the Harbor/Save the Bay company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Center for Science Education company.

In the current year, Save the Harbor/Save the Bay company and National Center for Science Education company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Save the Harbor/Save the Bay company nor National Center for Science Education company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Save the Harbor/Save the Bay company nor National Center for Science Education company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Save the Harbor/Save the Bay company nor National Center for Science Education company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Center for Science Education company nor Save the Harbor/Save the Bay company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Center for Science Education nor Save the Harbor/Save the Bay holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Center for Science Education company nor Save the Harbor/Save the Bay company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Save the Harbor/Save the Bay company employs more people globally than National Center for Science Education company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither National Center for Science Education nor Save the Harbor/Save the Bay holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Center for Science Education nor Save the Harbor/Save the Bay holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Center for Science Education nor Save the Harbor/Save the Bay holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Center for Science Education nor Save the Harbor/Save the Bay holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Center for Science Education nor Save the Harbor/Save the Bay holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Center for Science Education nor Save the Harbor/Save the Bay holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References