Comparison Overview

National Building Museum

VS

Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa

National Building Museum

401 F Street, NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20001, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nbm.org/

A Museum dedicated to celebrating and exploring the stories of the building industry and the built environment -- from past and preservation to future and innovation. Join us in person and online to be part of a dynamic community of professionals, families and students of all ages -- and enjoy the latest design and climate action thought leadership, as well as inspiring exhibitions year-round.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa

Campo de Santa Clara, 142-145, Lisboa, Lisboa, 1100-474, PT
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.trienaldelisboa.com

Lisbon Architecture Triennale is a non-profit association whose mission is to research, foster and promote architectural thinking and practice. Founded in 2007, it holds a major forum every three years for the debate, discussion and dissemination of architecture that crosses geographic and disciplinary boundaries. In addition to the main editions, we organize annually Open House Lisboa, the Critical Distance conference cycle and many activities in our palace headquarters. We also produce and participate in several outstanding events, our hors-série. From official national representations abroad to national prizes, and both domesticand international events devoted to collaborative thought (including Future Architecture Platform, Open House Worldwide, Valmor Architecture Award), we produce content of excellence, aimed at architects and beyond, focused broadly on the creative community and the general public in order to cultivate a collective sensitivity to architectural practice in our world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-building-museum.jpeg
National Building Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trienal-de-arquitectura-de-lisboa.jpeg
Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Building Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Building Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa in 2026.

Incident History — National Building Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Building Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-building-museum.jpeg
National Building Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trienal-de-arquitectura-de-lisboa.jpeg
Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Building Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Building Museum company.

In the current year, Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa company and National Building Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa company nor National Building Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa company nor National Building Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa company nor National Building Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Building Museum company nor Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Building Museum nor Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Building Museum company nor Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Building Museum company employs more people globally than Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Building Museum nor Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Trienal de Arquitectura de Lisboa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References