Comparison Overview

National Building Museum

VS

Toronto Zoo

National Building Museum

401 F Street, NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20001, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

A Museum dedicated to celebrating and exploring the stories of the building industry and the built environment -- from past and preservation to future and innovation. Join us in person and online to be part of a dynamic community of professionals, families and students of all ages -- and enjoy the latest design and climate action thought leadership, as well as inspiring exhibitions year-round.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Toronto Zoo

351A Old Finch Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M1B 5K7
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 600 and 649

The Toronto Zoo is Canada’s premier zoo, known for its interactive education and conservation science activities. We also value animal species and care for them. They are the basis of our wildlife conservation and public education efforts and their wellbeing is our priority. We connect animals in our care to their wild counterparts, plants, and habitats to build a brighter future for wildlife. OUR MISSION: Our Toronto Zoo - Connecting people, animals, conservation science and traditional knowledge to fight extinction. OUR VISION: A world where people, wildlife and wild spaces thrive. OUR VALUES (The 4 Cares): Animals Team Guests & Community Climate STRATEGIC PRIORITIES (Areas of Focus): Belonging Nature's Insurance Policy Wildlife Advocates Wow for Good By connecting our Areas of Focus with our 4 Cares, we show how every action drives us forward. These aren’t just plans — they’re bold steps that challenge the status quo, push boundaries, and fuel our mission to protect wildlife and ignite meaningful change at your Toronto Zoo. Learn more about our Strategic Plan at torontozoo.com/strategic.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 461
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-building-museum.jpeg
National Building Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toronto-zoo.jpeg
Toronto Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Building Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Toronto Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Building Museum in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Toronto Zoo in 2025.

Incident History — National Building Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Building Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Toronto Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Toronto Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-building-museum.jpeg
National Building Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/toronto-zoo.jpeg
Toronto Zoo
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2022
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

National Building Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Toronto Zoo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Toronto Zoo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas National Building Museum company has not reported any.

In the current year, Toronto Zoo company and National Building Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Toronto Zoo company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while National Building Museum company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Toronto Zoo company nor National Building Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Toronto Zoo company nor National Building Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Building Museum company nor Toronto Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Building Museum nor Toronto Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Building Museum company nor Toronto Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Toronto Zoo company employs more people globally than National Building Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Building Museum nor Toronto Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Toronto Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Toronto Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Toronto Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Toronto Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor Toronto Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X