Comparison Overview

National Building Museum

VS

National Amusement Park Historical Association

National Building Museum

401 F Street, NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20001, US
Last Update: 2026-01-20
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.nbm.org/

A Museum dedicated to celebrating and exploring the stories of the building industry and the built environment -- from past and preservation to future and innovation. Join us in person and online to be part of a dynamic community of professionals, families and students of all ages -- and enjoy the latest design and climate action thought leadership, as well as inspiring exhibitions year-round.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 109
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

National Amusement Park Historical Association

PO Box 871, Lombard, 60148-0871, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.napha.org

The National Amusement Park Historical Association, (NAPHA) is an international not-for-profit tax-exempt corporation dedicated to the preservation, documentation and enjoyment of the amusement and theme park industry - past, present and future. NAPHA is the worlds’ only educational and enthusiast organization dedicated to all aspects of the amusement or theme park. The organization’s purpose is to preserve, through documentation, the history of the amusement park and theme park industry, past and present; to promote, through knowledge and awareness, the enjoyment of amusement and theme parks; to inform members and the public, through our publications, about historical and current information regarding the amusement and theme park industry; to furnish educational presentations to libraries, civic groups, private clubs or any organization about the amusement and theme park industry; and, to bring together people with a mutual interest in the amusement and theme park industry. The NAPHA Archives includes printed materials, correspondence, blueprints, photos, press releases, and NAD newspaper clippings. Other material in the NAPHA Archives include information on fun houses, roller coasters, water rides, miscellaneous rides, trains and locomotives and amusement parks. NAPHA continues to add materials such as reference books, magazines, brochures and press kits, photos, postcards, slides and videotapes and other artifacts to the Archives and author-donated amusement books.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-building-museum.jpeg
National Building Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-amusement-park-historical-association.jpeg
National Amusement Park Historical Association
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Building Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Amusement Park Historical Association
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Building Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Amusement Park Historical Association in 2026.

Incident History — National Building Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Building Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Amusement Park Historical Association (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Amusement Park Historical Association cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-building-museum.jpeg
National Building Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-amusement-park-historical-association.jpeg
National Amusement Park Historical Association
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Building Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Amusement Park Historical Association company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Amusement Park Historical Association company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Building Museum company.

In the current year, National Amusement Park Historical Association company and National Building Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Amusement Park Historical Association company nor National Building Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Amusement Park Historical Association company nor National Building Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Amusement Park Historical Association company nor National Building Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Building Museum company nor National Amusement Park Historical Association company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Building Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Building Museum company nor National Amusement Park Historical Association company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Building Museum company employs more people globally than National Amusement Park Historical Association company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither National Building Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Building Museum nor National Amusement Park Historical Association holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References