Comparison Overview

National Braille Press

VS

Mediarama

National Braille Press

88 St. Stephen St., Boston, MA, 02115, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

National Braille Press (NBP) is a Boston-based non-profit printer and publisher of braille materials and tactile graphics that supports literacy for blind children and adults. NBP provides accessible materials for blind and low vision students, consumers, and adults in the workplace. Our services are provided to businesses, state and local governments, and educational organizations so that blind people have access to information in all areas of their life. Our services cover a broad spectrum of braille transcription and ink printing that range from print/braille children’s books to high stakes assessments, textbooks, product manuals, financial statements, literary novels, magazine inserts, and business cards. Through our Center for Braille Innovation, National Braille Press is researching and developing affordable digital braille computers and tablets for the blind, which will allow dynamic, real-time output of a digital e-braille and tactile graphics for textbooks and standardized tests.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mediarama

business park Rumyantsevo, Moscow, 142784, RU
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Publishing agency. Since 1998 we are publising several trade magazines: TKT (Cinema & Television Equipment), Signs of Russia, Cable&Satellite, Printer&Publisher etc. Publisher - Eduard Chumakov. Publishing director - Alex Shirokikh. In March 2009 formed a joint venture with Expert mediaholding - Expert-Mediarama B2B group for publishing industrial magazines under "Expert" brand.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-braille-press.jpeg
National Braille Press
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediarama.jpeg
Mediarama
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Braille Press
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mediarama
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Braille Press in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mediarama in 2025.

Incident History — National Braille Press (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Braille Press cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mediarama (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mediarama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-braille-press.jpeg
National Braille Press
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mediarama.jpeg
Mediarama
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mediarama company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Braille Press company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mediarama company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Braille Press company.

In the current year, Mediarama company and National Braille Press company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mediarama company nor National Braille Press company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mediarama company nor National Braille Press company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mediarama company nor National Braille Press company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Braille Press company nor Mediarama company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Braille Press nor Mediarama holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Braille Press company nor Mediarama company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Braille Press company employs more people globally than Mediarama company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither National Braille Press nor Mediarama holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Braille Press nor Mediarama holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Braille Press nor Mediarama holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Braille Press nor Mediarama holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Braille Press nor Mediarama holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Braille Press nor Mediarama holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.