Comparison Overview

National Bank of Pakistan

VS

DenizBank

National Bank of Pakistan

NBP Building, I.I. Chundrigar Road, Karachi, Sindh, PK, 74000
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

National Bank of Pakistan is largest state owned bank operating in Pakistan. It has redefined its role and has moved from a public sector organization into a modern commercial bank. The Bank's services are available to individuals, corporate entities and government. While it continues to act as trustee of public funds and as the agent to the State Bank of Pakistan (in places where SBP does not have presence). National Bank of Pakistan has built an extensive branch network with over 1313 branches in Pakistan. It has agency arrangements with more than 3000 correspondent banks worldwide. Its subsidiaries are Taurus Securities Ltd, NBP Exchange Company Ltd, NBP Capital Ltd, NBP Modaraba Management Company Ltd, and CJSC Bank, Almaty, Kazakhstan. It has recently opened a subsidiary in Dushanbe, Tajikistan. The bank has global presence having 23 overseas branches in 11 countries. The bank also has a representative office in China and Canada. The Bank's joint ventures are, United National Bank (UK), First Investment Bank and NAFA, an Asset Management Company (a joint venture with NIB Bank & Fullerton Fund Management of Singapore). National Bank has earned recognition and numerous awards internationally.(see Awards and Achievements) Symbol of NBP Assigned by all Stock Exchanges: NBP

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 7,408
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

DenizBank

Büyükdere Caddesi 141, Esentepe, Istanbul, TR, 34394
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

In 1997, DenizBank was acquired by the Zorlu Holding in the form of a banking license from the Privatization Administration. Undergoing three shareholder changes and done public offering in its short history, the Bank was acquired in October 2006 by Dexia, one of the leading financial groups of Europe. Later on, being subject to the biggest one-time investment made by Russia in Turkey, DenizBank started to serve under the umbrella of Sberbank, one of the biggest banks in the world, as of September 28, 2012. Finally, the Bank’s shares were transferred to Emirates NBD as of August 2019, again one of the leading institutions in its region.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,943
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-bank-of-pakistan.jpeg
National Bank of Pakistan
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denizbank.jpeg
DenizBank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Bank of Pakistan
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
DenizBank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Bank of Pakistan in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DenizBank in 2025.

Incident History — National Bank of Pakistan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Bank of Pakistan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — DenizBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DenizBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-bank-of-pakistan.jpeg
National Bank of Pakistan
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/denizbank.jpeg
DenizBank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DenizBank company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Bank of Pakistan company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

National Bank of Pakistan company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas DenizBank company has not reported any.

In the current year, DenizBank company and National Bank of Pakistan company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither DenizBank company nor National Bank of Pakistan company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither DenizBank company nor National Bank of Pakistan company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

National Bank of Pakistan company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while DenizBank company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither National Bank of Pakistan company nor DenizBank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Bank of Pakistan nor DenizBank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Bank of Pakistan company nor DenizBank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DenizBank company employs more people globally than National Bank of Pakistan company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither National Bank of Pakistan nor DenizBank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Bank of Pakistan nor DenizBank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Bank of Pakistan nor DenizBank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Bank of Pakistan nor DenizBank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Bank of Pakistan nor DenizBank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Bank of Pakistan nor DenizBank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H