Comparison Overview

National Bank of Egypt (NBE)

VS

RBL Bank

National Bank of Egypt (NBE)

1187 Cornish El Nile Street, Boulak, Cairo, undefined, EG
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Since its inception in 1898 with a capital of GBP1 million, NBE has been regarded as one of the oldest and most respected commercial banks in Egypt.Never isolated from national issues or concerns, NBE has been the primary supporter of Egypt’s national economy by financing the major Egyptian national projects. NBE’s missions and operations have continuously evolved throughout history and the economic and political changes experienced by the country.NBE was entrusted with issuing banknotes and handling government accounts, then in the 1950’s its activities evolved to undertaking the duties of the Central Bank. In the 1960’s it focused on commercial banking while still handling the central banking duties in locations where the Central Bank had no branches. Eventually, issuing and managing Investment Certificates for the State.NBE currently controls 23.6% of the market share of total assets in the Egyptian banking sector, 25.8% of total deposits, and 21.8% of total loans. NBE owns a large network includes over 337 branches, offices and banking units across the country, alongside an international presence through NBE (United Kingdom), NBE (Republic of the Sudan) and NBE’s branches in New York (United States of America) and Shanghai (People’s Republic of China), as well as representative offices in Johannesburg (South Africa), Dubai (United Arab Emirates), and Adis Ababa (Republic of Ethiopia), in addition to a branch in the Dubai International Finance Center.NBE also has a network of correspondents throughout the world, but centered in Europe— Egypt’s primary trade partner.NBE is always keen on an effective presence in brokerage, financing different sectors, and maintaining the client’s trust by offing the best and latest services.Whilst leading the local banking market,NBE is continuously upgrading its network of branches and channels of electronic communication, and strives to refine its human resources through advanced national and international training programs.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 25,164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RBL Bank

RBL Bank Limited, One World Center, Tower 2B , 6th Floor, 841, Senapati Bapat Marg, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400013
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

RBL Bank is one of India’s fastest growing private sector banks with an expanding presence across the country. The Bank offers specialized services under six business verticals namely: Corporate & Institutional Banking, Commercial Banking, Branch & Business Banking, Retail Assets and Treasury and Financial Markets Operations. It currently services over 11.53 million customers through a network of 517 branches; 1,166 business correspondent branches (of which 298 banking outlets) and 414 ATMs spread across 28 Indian states and Union Territories. RBL Bank is listed on both NSE and BSE (RBLBANK). For further details, please visit https://www.rblbank.com RBL Bank Blog - https://blog.rblbank.com/ Don’t share personal or sensitive details on social media. Refer to our Bank’s social media guideline: https://bit.ly/3OVgJ4p

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 15,163
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-bank-of-egypt.jpeg
National Bank of Egypt (NBE)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbl-bank.jpeg
RBL Bank
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Bank of Egypt (NBE)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RBL Bank
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Bank of Egypt (NBE) in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBL Bank in 2025.

Incident History — National Bank of Egypt (NBE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Bank of Egypt (NBE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RBL Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBL Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-bank-of-egypt.jpeg
National Bank of Egypt (NBE)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbl-bank.jpeg
RBL Bank
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to RBL Bank company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, RBL Bank company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company.

In the current year, RBL Bank company and National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither RBL Bank company nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither RBL Bank company nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither RBL Bank company nor National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company nor RBL Bank company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) nor RBL Bank holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company nor RBL Bank company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Bank of Egypt (NBE) company employs more people globally than RBL Bank company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) nor RBL Bank holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) nor RBL Bank holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) nor RBL Bank holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) nor RBL Bank holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) nor RBL Bank holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Bank of Egypt (NBE) nor RBL Bank holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N