Comparison Overview

NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals

VS

Litigation Management, Inc.

NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals

253-259 Whitehall Road, Leeds, undefined, LS12 6ER, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

NALP has been promoting paralegals since 1987 and is the longest running professional paralegal body in the UK NALP strives to ensure that our members are recognised as a key part of the legal profession by the quality of our qualifications and professional development. We encourage, promote and develop the role and practice of the paralegal and represent the best interests of our members. NALP's objectives: Promote and celebrate paralegals as legal services professionals in their own right Provide high quality qualifications at all levels aimed specifically at and for paralegals Engage with high quality Centres to deliver NALP qualifications across England and Wales Provide innovative and accessible assessments in order to give all learners the greatest opportunity to achieve their academic goals whilst maintaining high assessment standards Provide paralegals with meaningful membership levels that are commensurate with their qualifications Represent, promote and express the collective interests of its Members Act as a consultative body on all things concerned with the Paralegal Profession as the foremost professional membership body for Paralegals in England and Wales Work with others within the legal services sector to support public confidence in the sector as a whole What NALP does NALP advocates on behalf of its members, to the Legal Services Board, Legal Services Commission, Ministry of Justice, Skills for Justice, Solicitors Regulation Authority and The Law Society. NALP's aim is to strengthen the voice of NALP Paralegals in the legal world. Ofqual Accredited Qualifications Our Paralegal Courses are regulated and accredited by Ofqual. The non-ministerial government department that regulates qualifications, exams and assessments in England, this includes regulation for all GSCEs and A Levels within the UK.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Litigation Management, Inc.

7976 Mayfield Road, Suite 150, Chesterland, Ohio, 44026, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

LMI transforms litigation processes to drive efficiencies and contain costs. With 40 years of experience, our legal, medical, and technology consultants and professionals redefine customer service by providing innovative solutions and high-quality deliverables to our law firm and corporate partners. We collect data and documents from a variety of sources, including fact sheets and medical care providers, and use proprietary technology and skilled nurses, lawyers, and technologists to: • Bring visibility to litigation and complex matters, • Support the strategy for resolving litigation, and • Help to cost-effectively manage the overall litigation. We partner with clients - plaintiff counsel, defense counsel, judges, mediators, and more - in matters ranging from single cases to mass torts. Services & Solutions: • Litigation Census & Fact Sheet Services • Medical-Legal Services • Regulatory & Compliance • Case Management & Settlement Support • Analytics & Technology

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 164
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-association-of-licensed-paralegals.jpeg
NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litigation-management-inc.jpeg
Litigation Management, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Litigation Management, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Litigation Management, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Litigation Management, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Litigation Management, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-association-of-licensed-paralegals.jpeg
NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/litigation-management-inc.jpeg
Litigation Management, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Litigation Management, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Litigation Management, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals company.

In the current year, Litigation Management, Inc. company and NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Litigation Management, Inc. company nor NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Litigation Management, Inc. company nor NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Litigation Management, Inc. company nor NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals company nor Litigation Management, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals nor Litigation Management, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals company nor Litigation Management, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Litigation Management, Inc. company employs more people globally than NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals nor Litigation Management, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals nor Litigation Management, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals nor Litigation Management, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals nor Litigation Management, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals nor Litigation Management, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NALP | National Association of Licensed Paralegals nor Litigation Management, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X