Comparison Overview

National Academy of Sciences

VS

PPS Group

National Academy of Sciences

2101 Constitution Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
Between 700 and 749

The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) is an honorific society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. The NAS was signed into being by President Abraham Lincoln on March 3, 1863, at the height of the Civil War. As mandated in its Act of Incorporation, the NAS has, since 1863, served to "investigate, examine, experiment, and report upon any subject of science or art"​ whenever called upon to do so by any department of the government. Scientific issues would become even more contentious and complex in the years following the war. To keep pace with the growing roles that science and technology would play in public life, the institution that was founded in 1863 eventually expanded to include the National Research Council in 1916, the National Academy of Engineering in 1964, and the National Academy of Medicine (formerly known as the Institute of Medicine) in 1970. Collectively, the four organizations are known as the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 774
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PPS Group

London, London, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 700 and 749

Founded in 1990. PPS Group is an award winning communications consultancy working in the tougher areas of communication. Now partnered with Newgate Communications. Our services include: - Corporate and B2B Communications - Engaging and Consulting Communities - Local and National Public Affairs - Media Relations - Mobilising and Securing Support - Issues and Crisis Management - Property PR

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 48
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-academy-of-sciences.jpeg
National Academy of Sciences
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pps-group_2.jpeg
PPS Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Academy of Sciences
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PPS Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Academy of Sciences in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PPS Group in 2025.

Incident History — National Academy of Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Academy of Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PPS Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PPS Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-academy-of-sciences.jpeg
National Academy of Sciences
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pps-group_2.jpeg
PPS Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Academy of Sciences company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to PPS Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PPS Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Academy of Sciences company.

In the current year, PPS Group company and National Academy of Sciences company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PPS Group company nor National Academy of Sciences company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PPS Group company nor National Academy of Sciences company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PPS Group company nor National Academy of Sciences company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Academy of Sciences company nor PPS Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Academy of Sciences nor PPS Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

National Academy of Sciences company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PPS Group company.

National Academy of Sciences company employs more people globally than PPS Group company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither National Academy of Sciences nor PPS Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Academy of Sciences nor PPS Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Academy of Sciences nor PPS Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Academy of Sciences nor PPS Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Academy of Sciences nor PPS Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Academy of Sciences nor PPS Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H