Comparison Overview

Nathan James

VS

Victor Stanley

Nathan James

undefined, Worldwide, Earth, Planet, OO
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Nathan James was founded in 2016 with a simple mission in mind: To make on trend decorating affordable. We care about design, but we care about people more. When it comes to our customers: It’s easy to add a tagline on your website talking about how much you care about your customers and your product. You might be wondering if that’s exactly what this is, just another tagline. But the truth is, we actually care. And we work hard every day to prove that. Wether it be 100 day free returns, free shipping, shorter assembly, or stunning designs at affordable prices - We genuinely care about you and our products. When it comes to our team: Nathan James is a company firmly rooted in our values. And those values don’t just present themselves externally to our customers; we appreciate that time is our most valuable resource. That’s why we try to solve for happiness. Although our happiness is mostly defined by our relationship with ourselves, as an organization our goal is to ensure we don’t negatively affect that baseline. Limited meetings, no virtual events and no bureaucracy. We’re a young company that has successfully stayed true to our vision and values even as we’ve grown. And we vow to all of our team that these are values we’ll abide by, no matter our size. Read more about our values —https://nathanjames.com/blogs/latest/nathan-james-operating-values We also offer a comprehensive benefits package, 12 weeks of maternity leave at full pay, the ability to work from anywhere in the world you choose, a stipend to purchase whatever you need to make your work from home space work for you, and so much more. Read more about the benefits and perks of joining the NJ team here .https://nathanjames.com/blogs/latest/benefits-perks-nathan-james

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Victor Stanley

undefined, Dunkirk, Maryland, 20754, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Celebrating over 60 years, Victor Stanley passionately designs, engineers, and manufactures timeless site furnishings to support our customers’ efforts in bringing communities to life. Our mission is to provide the finest collection of site furnishings in the world. We have a responsibility to those who use our products, our employees, and the communities in which we live, work, and serve. This is why we are committed to the highest standards of quality, safety, ergonomics, and the protection of our environment and natural resources in everything we do. With this vision, we are uniquely positioned to provide designs that outlast changing styles while controlling quality from start to finish. With 200,000 sq/ft. of manufacturing space, our two factories in Maryland utilize four custom-designed state-of-the-art powder coating systems, thirteen computerized welding robots, in-house extrusion process for recycled slats, and automated metal- and wood-working equipment. We have thousands of installations of our products throughout the US and Canada and we export to more than twenty additional countries.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nathanjames.jpeg
Nathan James
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victor-stanley-inc.jpeg
Victor Stanley
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nathan James
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Victor Stanley
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nathan James in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Victor Stanley in 2025.

Incident History — Nathan James (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nathan James cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Victor Stanley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Victor Stanley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nathanjames.jpeg
Nathan James
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/victor-stanley-inc.jpeg
Victor Stanley
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Victor Stanley company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nathan James company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Victor Stanley company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nathan James company.

In the current year, Victor Stanley company and Nathan James company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Victor Stanley company nor Nathan James company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Victor Stanley company nor Nathan James company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Victor Stanley company nor Nathan James company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nathan James company nor Victor Stanley company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nathan James nor Victor Stanley holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nathan James company nor Victor Stanley company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Victor Stanley company employs more people globally than Nathan James company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Nathan James nor Victor Stanley holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nathan James nor Victor Stanley holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nathan James nor Victor Stanley holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nathan James nor Victor Stanley holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nathan James nor Victor Stanley holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nathan James nor Victor Stanley holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.