Comparison Overview

NASTAD

VS

Galveston County Health District

NASTAD

444 North Capitol Street NW, Washington, 20001, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.NASTAD.org

NASTAD is a leading non-partisan non-profit association that represents public health officials who administer HIV and hepatitis programs in the U.S. We work to advance the health and dignity of people living with and impacted by HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, and intersecting epidemics by strengthening governmental public health through advocacy, capacity building, and social justice. Each of NASTAD’s seven programmatic teams—Health Care Access, Health Systems Integration, Policy & Legislative Affairs, Hepatitis, Prevention, Health Equity, and Drug User Health—interpret and influence policies, conduct trainings, offer technical assistance, and provide advocacy mobilization for U.S. health departments to improve health outcomes for people living with HIV and hepatitis. NASTAD's vision is a world committed to ending HIV/AIDS, viral hepatitis, and intersecting epidemics.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Galveston County Health District

9850 Emmett F Lowry Expy, Texas City, 77591, US
Last Update: 2026-03-12
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gchd.org

The Galveston County Health District is committed to identifying public health issues that impact our everyday life. We work daily to prevent disease, protect against public health threats and promote good health for all of Galveston County. Mission: Protecting and promoting the One Health of Galveston County. Vision: To be a pillar, promoter, protector, and provider of healthfulness in Galveston County. Mission: Protecting and promoting the optimal health and well-being of Galveston County. Vision: To become the healthiest county in Texas.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 258
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nastad.jpeg
NASTAD
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/galveston-county-health-district.jpeg
Galveston County Health District
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NASTAD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Galveston County Health District
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NASTAD in 2026.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Galveston County Health District in 2026.

Incident History — NASTAD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NASTAD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Galveston County Health District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Galveston County Health District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nastad.jpeg
NASTAD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/galveston-county-health-district.jpeg
Galveston County Health District
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Galveston County Health District company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NASTAD company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Galveston County Health District company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NASTAD company.

In the current year, Galveston County Health District company and NASTAD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Galveston County Health District company nor NASTAD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Galveston County Health District company nor NASTAD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Galveston County Health District company nor NASTAD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NASTAD company nor Galveston County Health District company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NASTAD nor Galveston County Health District holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NASTAD company nor Galveston County Health District company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Galveston County Health District company employs more people globally than NASTAD company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither NASTAD nor Galveston County Health District holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NASTAD nor Galveston County Health District holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NASTAD nor Galveston County Health District holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NASTAD nor Galveston County Health District holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NASTAD nor Galveston County Health District holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NASTAD nor Galveston County Health District holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References