Comparison Overview

Nashville Zoo

VS

Atlanta Contemporary

Nashville Zoo

3777 Nolensville Pike, Nashville, 37211, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Nashville Zoo at Grassmere is a 188-acre institution accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) whose mission is to inspire a culture of understanding and discovery of our natural world through conservation, innovation and leadership. Located in the heart of Nashville, the zoo has an extensive animal collection within its current 88 acres of developed exhibits. The Zoo attracts more than one million visitors annually as well as serving a diverse community through outreach programs within greater Nashville and mid-Tennessee.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 306
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Atlanta Contemporary

535 Means Street NW, Atlanta, Georgia, 30318, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Atlanta Contemporary, located in the city's historic Westside corridor, is one of the premier contemporary art organizations in the Southeast. Since 1973, we've focused on contemporary art and artists. Admission is free and open to the public, and our exhibitions change often - there's always something new to see. Join us as we build a community that offers ever-expanding support for the creation and appreciation of contemporary art.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nashville-zoo.jpeg
Nashville Zoo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-contemporary.jpeg
Atlanta Contemporary
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nashville Zoo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlanta Contemporary
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nashville Zoo in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Contemporary in 2025.

Incident History — Nashville Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nashville Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlanta Contemporary (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Contemporary cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nashville-zoo.jpeg
Nashville Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-contemporary.jpeg
Atlanta Contemporary
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nashville Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlanta Contemporary company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Atlanta Contemporary company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nashville Zoo company.

In the current year, Atlanta Contemporary company and Nashville Zoo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary company nor Nashville Zoo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary company nor Nashville Zoo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary company nor Nashville Zoo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nashville Zoo company nor Atlanta Contemporary company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nashville Zoo nor Atlanta Contemporary holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Nashville Zoo company nor Atlanta Contemporary company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nashville Zoo company employs more people globally than Atlanta Contemporary company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Nashville Zoo nor Atlanta Contemporary holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nashville Zoo nor Atlanta Contemporary holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nashville Zoo nor Atlanta Contemporary holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nashville Zoo nor Atlanta Contemporary holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nashville Zoo nor Atlanta Contemporary holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nashville Zoo nor Atlanta Contemporary holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X