Comparison Overview

Nasdaq

VS

Fannie Mae

Nasdaq

1, Liberty Plaza, New York, NY, US, 10006
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

At Nasdaq, our purpose is to advance economic progress for all. We power stronger economies, create more equitable opportunities, and contribute to a more sustainable world to help our communities, clients, employees, and people of all backgrounds reach their full potential. Meet the #NasdaqFam and learn about our purpose, culture and careers here: https://www.nasdaq.com/about/careers

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 8,217
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Fannie Mae

1100 15th St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20005, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

Fannie Mae creates opportunities for people to buy, refinance, or rent a home. We are a leading source of mortgage financing in all markets and at all times. We ensure the availability of affordable mortgage loans. The financing solutions we develop make sustainable homeownership and workforce rental housing a reality for millions of people. The work we do helps maintain the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, which has dominated the housing market since the 1950s. This popular mortgage loan makes committing to purchasing a home easier. It gives homeowners stability and peace of mind by providing predictable mortgage payments over the life of the loan. Our mission is to facilitate equitable and sustainable access to homeownership and quality affordable rental housing across America. We continue to innovate and promote a stronger, safer, and more efficient housing finance system to support more opportunities for homebuyers and renters in communities throughout the nation. Join us to help shape the future of housing: http://fanniemae.com/careers. This LinkedIn company page is moderated. Before joining the conversation, please review our Social Media Guidelines: https://www.fanniemae.com/stay-connected.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 12,691
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nasdaq.jpeg
Nasdaq
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fannie-mae-corporation_19722.jpeg
Fannie Mae
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nasdaq
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fannie Mae
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nasdaq in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fannie Mae in 2025.

Incident History — Nasdaq (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nasdaq cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fannie Mae (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fannie Mae cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nasdaq.jpeg
Nasdaq
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2019
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fannie-mae-corporation_19722.jpeg
Fannie Mae
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nasdaq company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Fannie Mae company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Nasdaq company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Fannie Mae company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fannie Mae company and Nasdaq company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fannie Mae company nor Nasdaq company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Fannie Mae company nor Nasdaq company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Nasdaq company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Fannie Mae company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Nasdaq company nor Fannie Mae company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nasdaq nor Fannie Mae holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Nasdaq company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Fannie Mae company.

Fannie Mae company employs more people globally than Nasdaq company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Nasdaq nor Fannie Mae holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nasdaq nor Fannie Mae holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nasdaq nor Fannie Mae holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nasdaq nor Fannie Mae holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nasdaq nor Fannie Mae holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nasdaq nor Fannie Mae holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H