Comparison Overview

Naperville Public Library

VS

Portland Public Library

Naperville Public Library

200 W. Jefferson, Naperville, IL, 60540, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22

The Naperville Public Library serves a community of 146,000 through three full service facilities. The Library has consistently received a 5 Star Rating by the Library Journal and was awarded “2012 Chicago Tribune’s Best Work Place”. The community support for the Library is evident in both its use and funding. The Library Board, administration, and staff are committed to excellence in serving the residents of Naperville. Naperville Public Library is an Equal Opportunity Employer with a diverse workforce.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 153
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Portland Public Library

5 Monument Sq, Portland, Maine, 04101, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

Established in 1867, the Portland Public Library is Maine’s oldest and largest public library system. Governed by a 16 member Board of Trustees, the Library is a non-profit organization. The Library’s mission is to serve the Greater Portland community by providing a diverse collection of books and other resources, with access to information resources worldwide. The Library’s services support the educational, informational, and recreational interests of all community members. The Library is a public-private partnership that receives annual operating support from the City of Portland, the State of Maine, Cumberland County, and gifts from businesses, foundations and individuals like you.

NAICS: 51912
NAICS Definition: Libraries and Archives
Employees: 85
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naperville-public-library.jpeg
Naperville Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/portland-public-library.jpeg
Portland Public Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Naperville Public Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Portland Public Library
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naperville Public Library in 2025.

Incidents vs Libraries Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Portland Public Library in 2025.

Incident History — Naperville Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naperville Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Portland Public Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Portland Public Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naperville-public-library.jpeg
Naperville Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/portland-public-library.jpeg
Portland Public Library
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Naperville Public Library company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Portland Public Library company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Portland Public Library company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Naperville Public Library company.

In the current year, Portland Public Library company and Naperville Public Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Portland Public Library company nor Naperville Public Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Portland Public Library company nor Naperville Public Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Portland Public Library company nor Naperville Public Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Naperville Public Library company nor Portland Public Library company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Naperville Public Library nor Portland Public Library holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Naperville Public Library company nor Portland Public Library company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Naperville Public Library company employs more people globally than Portland Public Library company, reflecting its scale as a Libraries.

Neither Naperville Public Library nor Portland Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Naperville Public Library nor Portland Public Library holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Naperville Public Library nor Portland Public Library holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Naperville Public Library nor Portland Public Library holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Naperville Public Library nor Portland Public Library holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Naperville Public Library nor Portland Public Library holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H