Comparison Overview

NAPA Auto Parts

VS

Sodimac

NAPA Auto Parts

2999 Wildwood Pkwy, Atlanta, Georgia, 30339, US
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Through nearly 6,000 auto parts stores and over 16,000 auto care and collision centers in the U.S., NAPA has America’s largest network of parts and care. The NAPA Network is supported by nationwide distribution centers with approximately 800,000 available parts, accessories and supplies. Widely recognized for quality parts, rapid availability and knowledgeable people, NAPA Auto Parts stores serve automotive service professionals, do-it-yourselfers and everyday drivers with quality parts, accessories and supplies to keep cars, trucks and equipment performing safely and efficiently. For more information, visit www.napaonline.com.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,638
Subsidiaries: 31
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sodimac

Chile, Brasil, Perú, Argentina, Uruguay, Colombia, México, CL
Last Update: 2025-11-26

#SomosUnEquipo Te invitamos a conocer y a ser parte de nuestra Casa, un lugar donde la innovación, la sostenibilidad y la diversidad se viven día a día. Con más de 60 años de trayectoria y presencia en Chile, Perú, Colombia, Argentina, Brasil, Uruguay y México, nuestra compañía se enfoca en el mejoramiento del hogar, desarrollando soluciones únicas e innovadoras para nuestros clientes, mientras que nuestros equipos trabajan colaborativamente para cumplir nuestro Propósito: Simplificar y disfrutar más la vida. Somos parte de Falabella y ofrecemos grandes oportunidades de desarrollo profesional, movilidad y aprendizaje, así como también la experiencia de trabajar en uno de los principales conglomerados de Retail de América Latina. Súmate a nuestra Casa, súmate a Falabella. ¡Te esperamos! Falabella Corporativo: Chile – Perú - India Falabella Retail: Colombia - Chile - Perú Sodimac: Chile - México - Perú - Argentina - Colombia - Brasil - Uruguay Falabella Financiero: Chile - Perú - Colombia - México Falabella.com: Chile Linio: Perú - México - Chile - Colombia Tottus: Chile – Perú Falabella Inmobiliario: Chile - Perú Mall Plaza: Chile - Colombia - Perú

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 22,941
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/napa-auto-parts.jpeg
NAPA Auto Parts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sodimac-chile.jpeg
Sodimac
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NAPA Auto Parts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sodimac
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAPA Auto Parts in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sodimac in 2025.

Incident History — NAPA Auto Parts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAPA Auto Parts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sodimac (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sodimac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/napa-auto-parts.jpeg
NAPA Auto Parts
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sodimac-chile.jpeg
Sodimac
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Sodimac company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NAPA Auto Parts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sodimac company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NAPA Auto Parts company.

In the current year, Sodimac company and NAPA Auto Parts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sodimac company nor NAPA Auto Parts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sodimac company nor NAPA Auto Parts company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sodimac company nor NAPA Auto Parts company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts company nor Sodimac company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts nor Sodimac holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NAPA Auto Parts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sodimac company.

Sodimac company employs more people globally than NAPA Auto Parts company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts nor Sodimac holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts nor Sodimac holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts nor Sodimac holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts nor Sodimac holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts nor Sodimac holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NAPA Auto Parts nor Sodimac holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H