Comparison Overview

Nanomotion

VS

teamtechnik Group

Nanomotion

Mordot HaCarmel Industrial Park, 3 HaYetsira, PO Box 623, Yokneam, IL, 20692
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Nanomotion designs and manufactures advanced motion systems, standard linear & rotary axes for motion control, optronic modules and piezo motors, drivers, controllers. Based on proprietary piezoelectric technology, Nanomotion's motors and motion systems are suitable for a diversified range of applications, from semiconductor to biomedical equipment, metrology to data storage and defense security and sensing. Nanomotion stages and motion systems are well suited to the demanding performance of semiconductor manufacturing and inspect. Systems for ambient environment as well as vacuum systems are designed to achieve the utmost in precision and position stability. Nanomotion optronic modules for commercial and defense applications provide the greatest advantage in SWaP (size, weight & power) for focusing, optical image stabilization, hyperspectral imaging, and shutter/filter control. These modules are designed and manufactured to function in flight, on weapons and meet the most challenging requirements of shock, vibration and temperature range for defense applications.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

teamtechnik Group

Planckstr. 40, 71691 Freiberg am Neckar, undefined, undefined, DE
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

In 2023, the teamtechnik, BBS, Kahle and HEKUMA brands combined forces to become the “Production Automation“ Business Unit in the Dürr Group, with 2,500 employees at 20 sites worldwide. To further strengthen the cooperation, they will operate under a single, uniform brand, “BBS Automation”, from June 2025. Together, they will offer a comprehensive portfolio for a wide range of sectors, from insertion and removal technology to feeder technology, assembly and test lines and palletizing systems — solutions from a single source, worldwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 464
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nanomotion.jpeg
Nanomotion
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teamtechnik.jpeg
teamtechnik Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Nanomotion
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
teamtechnik Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nanomotion in 2025.

Incidents vs Industrial Automation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for teamtechnik Group in 2025.

Incident History — Nanomotion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nanomotion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — teamtechnik Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

teamtechnik Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nanomotion.jpeg
Nanomotion
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/teamtechnik.jpeg
teamtechnik Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

teamtechnik Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nanomotion company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, teamtechnik Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Nanomotion company.

In the current year, teamtechnik Group company and Nanomotion company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither teamtechnik Group company nor Nanomotion company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither teamtechnik Group company nor Nanomotion company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither teamtechnik Group company nor Nanomotion company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Nanomotion company nor teamtechnik Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Nanomotion nor teamtechnik Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

teamtechnik Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Nanomotion company.

teamtechnik Group company employs more people globally than Nanomotion company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Automation.

Neither Nanomotion nor teamtechnik Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Nanomotion nor teamtechnik Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Nanomotion nor teamtechnik Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Nanomotion nor teamtechnik Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Nanomotion nor teamtechnik Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Nanomotion nor teamtechnik Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H