Comparison Overview

Namify

VS

Coast Label Company

Namify

280 West 900 North, Springville, UT, 84663, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Namify is a U.S. manufacturer of identification and branding items, offering same-day services in Graphic Design, Full Color Printing, Engraving, Embroidery, and Wide Format Printing. Namify serves over 130,000 clients worldwide, including over 65% of the Fortune 500. Flagship products include: - Name Tags - Lanyards - Vinyl Banners - Office Signs - Screen Printed and Embroidered Apparel - Gifts and Awards - Promotional Giveaways

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Coast Label Company

17406 Mt. Cliffwood Circle, Fountain Valley, CA, 92708, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Coast Label is a specialty label manufacturer that thrives on projects requiring problem solving. The core of our business has always been to deliver solutions that meet customers’ unique label needs. Founded over 40 years ago, Coast Label currently occupies a L.I.F.E.® environmentally certified facility in Fountain Valley, California. As part of our commitment to the quality of your product as well as excellent service, we maintain an ISO 9001:2015 internationally recognized quality system. Coast Label is also proud to be a four-time winner of the prestigious Eugene Singer Award for Best Managed Company. Awarded by the label industry’s trade association (TLMI), you can rest assured knowing that you are working with one of the premier companies in the industry.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/namify.jpeg
Namify
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coast-label-company.jpeg
Coast Label Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Namify
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Coast Label Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Namify in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coast Label Company in 2025.

Incident History — Namify (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Namify cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Coast Label Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coast Label Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/namify.jpeg
Namify
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coast-label-company.jpeg
Coast Label Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Namify company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coast Label Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Coast Label Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Namify company.

In the current year, Coast Label Company company and Namify company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Coast Label Company company nor Namify company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Coast Label Company company nor Namify company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Coast Label Company company nor Namify company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Namify company nor Coast Label Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Namify nor Coast Label Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Namify company nor Coast Label Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Namify company employs more people globally than Coast Label Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Namify nor Coast Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Namify nor Coast Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Namify nor Coast Label Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Namify nor Coast Label Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Namify nor Coast Label Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Namify nor Coast Label Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N