Comparison Overview

NAMI Fox Valley

VS

Connecticut Renaissance

NAMI Fox Valley

211 E. Franklin St., Appleton, 54911, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.namifoxvalley.org

NAMI (National Alliance on Mental Illness) Fox Valley works to support and empower everyone touched by mental illness. We envision a stigma-free community, and society, that supports and promotes mental health and recovery. Serving Calumet, Outagamie, Waupaca and northern Winnebago counties, NAMI Fox Valley's dedicated staff and volunteers operate over two dozen different education, support and outreach programs in our community.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Connecticut Renaissance

1 Waterview Dr., Shelton, CT, 06484, US
Last Update:
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ctrenaissance.com

Connecticut Renaissance provides high quality, individually tailored behavioral health, substance use and criminal justice services to men, women, and adolescents throughout the state of Connecticut. Since 1967, CT Renaissance has earned the reputation as a leader in Evidence-Based Treatment practices; a leader that provides a warm, welcoming environment to the individuals we serve. Our services are trauma informed as well as gender and culturally responsive. Through programs run by a compassionate, committed, results-oriented team of clinicians, counselors, and administrators, our programs are designed to meet each person’s individual needs. Headquartered in Shelton, CT Renaissance maintains facilities in Waterbury, Bridgeport, Norwalk, Stamford and New Haven. At Renaissance, our ultimate goal is to assist clients, their families and significant others to lead happy, healthy and productive lives.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-fox-valley.jpeg
NAMI Fox Valley
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut-renaissance.jpeg
Connecticut Renaissance
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NAMI Fox Valley
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Connecticut Renaissance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NAMI Fox Valley in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Connecticut Renaissance in 2026.

Incident History — NAMI Fox Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NAMI Fox Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Connecticut Renaissance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Connecticut Renaissance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nami-fox-valley.jpeg
NAMI Fox Valley
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/connecticut-renaissance.jpeg
Connecticut Renaissance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both NAMI Fox Valley company and Connecticut Renaissance company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Connecticut Renaissance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to NAMI Fox Valley company.

In the current year, Connecticut Renaissance company and NAMI Fox Valley company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Connecticut Renaissance company nor NAMI Fox Valley company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Connecticut Renaissance company nor NAMI Fox Valley company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Connecticut Renaissance company nor NAMI Fox Valley company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NAMI Fox Valley company nor Connecticut Renaissance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NAMI Fox Valley nor Connecticut Renaissance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither NAMI Fox Valley company nor Connecticut Renaissance company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Connecticut Renaissance company employs more people globally than NAMI Fox Valley company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither NAMI Fox Valley nor Connecticut Renaissance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NAMI Fox Valley nor Connecticut Renaissance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NAMI Fox Valley nor Connecticut Renaissance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NAMI Fox Valley nor Connecticut Renaissance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NAMI Fox Valley nor Connecticut Renaissance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NAMI Fox Valley nor Connecticut Renaissance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References