Comparison Overview

National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)

VS

MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies

National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)

1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1000, Kansas City, MO, US, 64106-2197
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

NAIC members come from diverse backgrounds, politics, and geographies—but are united in their shared commitment to protect consumers and ensure fair, competitive, and healthy insurance markets. By establishing standards, conducting peer reviews, and coordinating regulatory oversight, the NAIC supports regulators’ efforts to safeguard the insurance sector and protect consumers. We also provide data reporting, licensing, analysis and financial assessments.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 741
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies

MD
Last Update:
Between 800 and 849

Our mission is to ensure sustainable growth for the information technologies and communications sector through policy development. We create business opportunities and encourage investment by promoting free market and liberalization policies. Transparency and efficiency are core values we believe are fundamental for an effective government, responsible businesses, and an active and involved civil society.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 151
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naic.jpeg
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ministry-of-information-and-communication-technologies.jpeg
MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naic.jpeg
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ministry-of-information-and-communication-technologies.jpeg
MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) company.

In the current year, MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies company and National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies company nor National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies company nor National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies company nor National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) company nor MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) nor MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies company.

National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) company employs more people globally than MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) nor MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) nor MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) nor MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) nor MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) nor MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) nor MInistry of Information and Communication Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H