Comparison Overview

NACCHO

VS

Institute for Public Health Innovation

NACCHO

1201 Eye Street, NW, 4th Floor, Washington, DC, US, 20005
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

The National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) is the national organization representing local health departments. NACCHO supports efforts that protect and improve the health of all people and all communities by promoting national policy, developing resources and programs, seeking health equity, and supporting effective local public health practice and systems.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 206
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Institute for Public Health Innovation

1250 Connecticut Ave NW, 202, Washington, District of Columbia, US, 20036
Last Update: 2025-11-27

The Institute for Public Health Innovation (IPHI) develops multi-sector partnerships and innovative solutions to improve the public’s health and well-being in the District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. Our work strengthens health systems and policy, enhances conditions that promote health, and builds community capacity to ensure equitable health opportunities for all. We invite you to browse our website at www.institutephi.org to learn more about our work.

NAICS: 92312
NAICS Definition: Administration of Public Health Programs
Employees: 108
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naccho.jpeg
NACCHO
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institutephi.jpeg
Institute for Public Health Innovation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
NACCHO
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Institute for Public Health Innovation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NACCHO in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for Public Health Innovation in 2025.

Incident History — NACCHO (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NACCHO cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Institute for Public Health Innovation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for Public Health Innovation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/naccho.jpeg
NACCHO
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institutephi.jpeg
Institute for Public Health Innovation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Institute for Public Health Innovation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NACCHO company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

NACCHO company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Institute for Public Health Innovation company has not reported any.

In the current year, Institute for Public Health Innovation company and NACCHO company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Institute for Public Health Innovation company nor NACCHO company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

NACCHO company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Institute for Public Health Innovation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Institute for Public Health Innovation company nor NACCHO company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither NACCHO company nor Institute for Public Health Innovation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither NACCHO nor Institute for Public Health Innovation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

NACCHO company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Institute for Public Health Innovation company.

NACCHO company employs more people globally than Institute for Public Health Innovation company, reflecting its scale as a Public Health.

Neither NACCHO nor Institute for Public Health Innovation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither NACCHO nor Institute for Public Health Innovation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither NACCHO nor Institute for Public Health Innovation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither NACCHO nor Institute for Public Health Innovation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither NACCHO nor Institute for Public Health Innovation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither NACCHO nor Institute for Public Health Innovation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H