Comparison Overview

MyLife

VS

a.l.p.h.a.

MyLife

None, None, Beverly, MA, US, 01915
Last Update: 2025-11-26

MyLife provides a secure, durable, enduring ai-enhanced internet-based platform for its membership to collect, curate, and ultimately share their personal stories, precious memories, and life narratives. Through these authorized individual commemorations, MyLife grants each of us an immortal and vital legacy to be shared with all who follow. By providing an accessible digital library of members, MyLife fosters interconnection, understanding, tolerance, and societal growth. Being gifted with the human experience is your membership ticket. MyLife is how humans of the 21st Century will be remembered for posterity.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

a.l.p.h.a.

537 W Bannock St, Boise, Idaho, 83702, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

a.l.p.h.a. is a non-profit organization that has been providing HIV related services to the Treasure Valley and Southern Idaho since 2003. Over the last 20 years we have increased our capacity from education, testing and support for HIV to being able to offer STI testing and treatment, hepatitis screening, PrEP, Doxy-PEP. We offer supportive services to people living with or affected by HIV and AIDS through the a.l.p.h.a. Choice Food Pantry. In 2025, we expanded services to offer mental health medication management. We continue our mission of providing service and access to high quality health care in mental health and HIV/STI prevention and treatment.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mylife-org.jpeg
MyLife
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allies-linked-for-the-prevention-of-hiv-and-aids.jpeg
a.l.p.h.a.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MyLife
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
a.l.p.h.a.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MyLife in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for a.l.p.h.a. in 2025.

Incident History — MyLife (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MyLife cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — a.l.p.h.a. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

a.l.p.h.a. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mylife-org.jpeg
MyLife
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/allies-linked-for-the-prevention-of-hiv-and-aids.jpeg
a.l.p.h.a.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MyLife company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to a.l.p.h.a. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, a.l.p.h.a. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MyLife company.

In the current year, a.l.p.h.a. company and MyLife company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither a.l.p.h.a. company nor MyLife company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither a.l.p.h.a. company nor MyLife company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither a.l.p.h.a. company nor MyLife company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MyLife company nor a.l.p.h.a. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MyLife nor a.l.p.h.a. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither MyLife company nor a.l.p.h.a. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MyLife company employs more people globally than a.l.p.h.a. company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither MyLife nor a.l.p.h.a. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MyLife nor a.l.p.h.a. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MyLife nor a.l.p.h.a. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MyLife nor a.l.p.h.a. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MyLife nor a.l.p.h.a. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MyLife nor a.l.p.h.a. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H