Comparison Overview

Mon Yough Community Services, Inc.

VS

Aspen Hope Center

Mon Yough Community Services, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 800 and 849

Since 1969, MYCS has helped individuals and families in the Mon-Yough region to Get Better based on the specific and unique circumstances presented by each case we receive. Here at MYCS we have focus on recovery. Our mission is to foster hope, renewal, healing, and wellness for those who face the challenges of mental health, substance abuse disorders and intellectual disabilities. Starting out as a mental health outpatient facility with three employees, MYCS has successfully grown and adapted to meet the growing needs of a changing community. With a current full-time staff of more than 300, we are one of the largest employers in McKeesport and its surrounding communities. MYCS participates in local and statewide initiatives, maintaining a constant emphasis on program development and quality improvement. Today, MYCS offers expert counseling and recovery-based programs in: Mental Health Vocational Services Intellectual Disabilities Drug and Alcohol Case Management Residential www.facebook.com/mycsofficial | www.twitter.com/MYCS1

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 137
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Aspen Hope Center

undefined, Basalt, CO, 81621, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Aspen Hope Center was established in June 2010 to meet the unmet mental health needs in Aspen and the Roaring Fork Valley. Those gaps in service were identified in a comprehensive study conducted by the University of Colorado Denver Depression Center in 2009. Aspen Hope Center has two teams covering from Aspen to Parachute, Colorado 24 hours/day, offering crisis services for those in emotional crisis and offering a continuum of comprehensive care.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 32
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mycs-inc..jpeg
Mon Yough Community Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-aspen-hope-center.jpeg
Aspen Hope Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Mon Yough Community Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aspen Hope Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aspen Hope Center in 2026.

Incident History — Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aspen Hope Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aspen Hope Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mycs-inc..jpeg
Mon Yough Community Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-aspen-hope-center.jpeg
Aspen Hope Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aspen Hope Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Aspen Hope Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. company.

In the current year, Aspen Hope Center company and Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aspen Hope Center company nor Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Aspen Hope Center company nor Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Aspen Hope Center company nor Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. company nor Aspen Hope Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. nor Aspen Hope Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. company nor Aspen Hope Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. company employs more people globally than Aspen Hope Center company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. nor Aspen Hope Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. nor Aspen Hope Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. nor Aspen Hope Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. nor Aspen Hope Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. nor Aspen Hope Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Mon Yough Community Services, Inc. nor Aspen Hope Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H