Comparison Overview

MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company

VS

SLB

MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company

73 Ray Street, Pleasanton, California, 94566, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

MyCrowd QA, A QASource Company, makes it easy to QA test your desktop and mobile website's and apps. With over 11,000 mobile device, OS, and platform combinations running live today it is impossible to test for them all. MyCrowd leverages the power of the crowd by giving you access to 1,000's of QA testers instantly to test your app or site on any device. Say goodbye to the hassle of internal mobile testing. Use MyCrowd and experience the relief of knowing you are testing properly. Visit MyCrowd.com or our parent company, QASource.com for more information.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SLB

5599 San Felipe St, Houston, Texas, 77056, US
Last Update: 2024-11-08 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

We are a technology company that unlocks access to energy for the benefit of all. As innovators, thatโ€™s been our mission for nearly a century. Today, we face a global imperative to create a future with more energy, but less carbon. Our diverse, innovative change makers are focused on going further in innovation and inventing the new energy technologies we need to get there.

NAICS: 513
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 106,850
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mycrowd-inc-.jpeg
MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slbglobal.jpeg
SLB
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SLB
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SLB in 2025.

Incident History โ€” MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” SLB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SLB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mycrowd-inc-.jpeg
MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/slbglobal.jpeg
SLB
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company company and SLB company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, SLB company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company company.

In the current year, SLB company and MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SLB company nor MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SLB company nor MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SLB company nor MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company company nor SLB company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

SLB company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company company.

SLB company employs more people globally than MyCrowd QA, a QASource Company company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X