Comparison Overview

MX Vice

VS

Financial Observer

MX Vice

125 High Street, Bath, undefined, BA3 2HN, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://mxvice.com

Europe's most visited off road website. Established in December 2010, MX Vice's first site debuted in early 2011 and has followed a strategy put together by former Digital Agency owner James Burfield. Working hard over the past 3 years the business really started to come together after the appointment of 19 year old (now 23) Lewis Phillips as Editor. Taking a chance on youth has proved to be the making of MX Vice. The site has over 200,000 visitors each month and reaches a minimum of 5.4 million people across all social platforms.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Financial Observer

PO Box 96, Lindfield, NSW, AU, 2070
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.financialobserver.com.au/

Financialobserver has been in existence since 2013 and is a masthead with complete commitment to providing video content and industry-leading events for the retail financial services sector. The video content consists in the main of both one-on-one interviews with leading industry figures, as well as editorial pieces to camera. Topical round-tables will be an additional initiative included, driven by subscriber demand.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mx-vice.jpeg
MX Vice
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/financial-observer.jpeg
Financial Observer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
MX Vice
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Financial Observer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MX Vice in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Financial Observer in 2025.

Incident History — MX Vice (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MX Vice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Financial Observer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Financial Observer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mx-vice.jpeg
MX Vice
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/financial-observer.jpeg
Financial Observer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Financial Observer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MX Vice company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Financial Observer company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to MX Vice company.

In the current year, Financial Observer company and MX Vice company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Financial Observer company nor MX Vice company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Financial Observer company nor MX Vice company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Financial Observer company nor MX Vice company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither MX Vice company nor Financial Observer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither MX Vice nor Financial Observer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Financial Observer company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to MX Vice company.

Neither MX Vice nor Financial Observer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither MX Vice nor Financial Observer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither MX Vice nor Financial Observer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither MX Vice nor Financial Observer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither MX Vice nor Financial Observer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither MX Vice nor Financial Observer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References