Comparison Overview

Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

VS

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning

Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments

777 N Capitol Street NE, Suite 300, Washington, DC, US, 20002
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

From its inner core to outer suburbs, more than five million people call the metropolitan Washington region home. And an additional million new residents are forecast between now and 2045. Managing this growth—and ensuring a well-maintained transportation system, clean air, water, and land, safe and healthy communities, and a vibrant economy—requires regional partnership. The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (COG) is the hub for this partnership. Every month, more than a thousand officials and experts come to COG to make connections, share information, and develop solutions to the region’s major challenges. Together, they help advance COG's Region Forward Vision for a more prosperous, accessible, livable, and sustainable future. Founded in 1957, COG is an independent, nonprofit association, with a membership of 300 elected officials from 24 local governments, the Maryland and Virginia state legislatures, and U.S. Congress. COG is supported by financial contributions from its member governments, federal and state grants and contracts, and donations from foundations and the private sector. The Board of Directors is COG’s governing body and is responsible for its overall policies. In addition, a wide network of policy, technical, and advisory committees, partnerships, and programs advance COG’s regional work. Elected leaders, police chiefs, housing directors, environmental experts, transportation planners, and more find value in working together at COG. A staff of more than 130 subject matter experts and other professionals support COG and its members.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 241
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning

433 W Van Buren St., Chicago, Illinois, 60607, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

The Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) is our region’s comprehensive planning organization. The agency and its partners developed and are implementing ON TO 2050, a new comprehensive regional plan to help the seven counties and 284 communities of northeastern Illinois implement strategies that address transportation, housing, economic development, open space, the environment, and other quality-of-life issues. View our social media comments policy: https://www.cmap.illinois.gov/comment-policy

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 152
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mwcog.jpeg
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-metropolitan-agency-for-planning.jpeg
Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning in 2025.

Incident History — Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mwcog.jpeg
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chicago-metropolitan-agency-for-planning.jpeg
Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments company.

In the current year, Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning company and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning company nor Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning company nor Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning company nor Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments company nor Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments nor Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments company nor Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments company employs more people globally than Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments nor Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments nor Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments nor Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments nor Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments nor Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments nor Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H