Comparison Overview

Muunqi

VS

Muratek

Muunqi

2451 Cumberland Pkwy SE, Atlanta, 30339, US
Last Update: 2025-11-24
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.muunqi.io

Muunqi is an open source software business that is a 'force multiplier' of software teams & infrastructure to enable high performance networks. We enable existing software teams to use hardware accelerators without the need for any specialized FPGA hardware skills. Customers can use these accelerators to improve their network performance by 2x to over 50x.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Muratek

75 Maiden Ln., New York, NY, 10038, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://muratek.com

Headquartered in Lower Manhattan, Muratek is the embodiment of a virtual IT department. Our aggressive philosophy combined with our rock-solid service make us your best option. The days of high-priced technology directors and underutilization of corporate assets is over. Muratek takes on the role of your entire IT department. Our consultants make executive level decisions in cornerstone business all over the city. Our technicians are deployed to dozens of businesses each and every day. And the benefits are obvious: There are no housing or payroll fees, no benefits or leave time. The choice is yours, but does hiring a 6-figure IT staff make sense when Muratek's corporate rates are the most competitive in the industry?

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muunqi.jpeg
Muunqi
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muratek.jpeg
Muratek
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Muunqi
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Muratek
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Muunqi in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Muratek in 2025.

Incident History — Muunqi (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Muunqi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Muratek (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Muratek cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muunqi.jpeg
Muunqi
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/muratek.jpeg
Muratek
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Muratek company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Muunqi company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Muratek company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Muunqi company.

In the current year, Muratek company and Muunqi company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Muratek company nor Muunqi company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Muratek company nor Muunqi company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Muratek company nor Muunqi company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Muunqi company nor Muratek company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Muunqi nor Muratek holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Muunqi company nor Muratek company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Muunqi nor Muratek holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Muunqi nor Muratek holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Muunqi nor Muratek holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Muunqi nor Muratek holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Muunqi nor Muratek holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Muunqi nor Muratek holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References