Comparison Overview

Museums In the Park

VS

Saratoga Automobile Museum

Museums In the Park

740 East 56th Place, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60637
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://museumsinthepark.org

Museums In the Park (MIP) is a coalition of Chicago museums located on Chicago Park District property. MIP works with the Chicago Park District, Chicago Public Schools, the City of Chicago, the State of Illinois and other entities to build greater awareness of the intrinsic value of museums. MIP is a 501(c)6, not-for-profit organization.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Saratoga Automobile Museum

110 Avenue of the Pines, Saratoga Springs, New York, 12866, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.saratogaautomuseum.org

The mission of the Saratoga Automobile Museum is to preserve, interpret and exhibit automobiles and automotive artifacts. We celebrate the automobile and educate the general public, students and enthusiasts regarding the role of the automobile in New York State and in the wider world. In addition to technical and design aspects, our educational focus is on the past, present and future social and economic impact of the automobile The Museum is chartered by the Board of Regents of the State of New York Department of Education as a not-for-profit institution. Additionally the Museum is a member of the American Association of Museums (AAM) and the National Association of Automobile Museums (NAAM).

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-in-the-park.jpeg
Museums In the Park
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saratoga-automobile-museum.jpeg
Saratoga Automobile Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museums In the Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Saratoga Automobile Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museums In the Park in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Saratoga Automobile Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Museums In the Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museums In the Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Saratoga Automobile Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Saratoga Automobile Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-in-the-park.jpeg
Museums In the Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/saratoga-automobile-museum.jpeg
Saratoga Automobile Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museums In the Park company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Saratoga Automobile Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Saratoga Automobile Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museums In the Park company.

In the current year, Saratoga Automobile Museum company and Museums In the Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Saratoga Automobile Museum company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Saratoga Automobile Museum company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Saratoga Automobile Museum company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museums In the Park company nor Saratoga Automobile Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Saratoga Automobile Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museums In the Park company nor Saratoga Automobile Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Saratoga Automobile Museum company employs more people globally than Museums In the Park company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Saratoga Automobile Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Saratoga Automobile Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Saratoga Automobile Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Saratoga Automobile Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Saratoga Automobile Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Saratoga Automobile Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References