Comparison Overview

Museums In the Park

VS

Nationalmuseet

Museums In the Park

740 East 56th Place, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60637
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://museumsinthepark.org

Museums In the Park (MIP) is a coalition of Chicago museums located on Chicago Park District property. MIP works with the Chicago Park District, Chicago Public Schools, the City of Chicago, the State of Illinois and other entities to build greater awareness of the intrinsic value of museums. MIP is a 501(c)6, not-for-profit organization.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Nationalmuseet

Copenhagen K, 1220, DK
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://natmus.dk

Nationalmuseet er Danmarks statslige og største kulturhistoriske museum. Museet omfatter en række besøgssteder udover udstillingerne i Prinsens Palæ i København: Frilandsmuseet, Kongernes Jelling, Frøslevlejrens Museum, Trelleborg, Krigsmuseet, Liselund, Kommandørgården, Frihedsmuseet, Christiansborg Slot, Kronborg Slot og Musikmuseet. Nationalmuseet udfører en række centrale opgaver på landsplan inden for især følgende områder: arkæologi, etnologi, numismatik, etnografi, naturvidenskab, bevaring, formidling, rådgivning vedrørende kirkerestaurering, behandling af danefæ og udlån af museets genstande.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 560
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-in-the-park.jpeg
Museums In the Park
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalmuseet.jpeg
Nationalmuseet
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museums In the Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nationalmuseet
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museums In the Park in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nationalmuseet in 2025.

Incident History — Museums In the Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museums In the Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nationalmuseet (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nationalmuseet cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-in-the-park.jpeg
Museums In the Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nationalmuseet.jpeg
Nationalmuseet
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Nationalmuseet company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museums In the Park company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nationalmuseet company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museums In the Park company.

In the current year, Nationalmuseet company and Museums In the Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nationalmuseet company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nationalmuseet company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nationalmuseet company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museums In the Park company nor Nationalmuseet company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Nationalmuseet holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museums In the Park company nor Nationalmuseet company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nationalmuseet company employs more people globally than Museums In the Park company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Nationalmuseet holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Nationalmuseet holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Nationalmuseet holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Nationalmuseet holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Nationalmuseet holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Nationalmuseet holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References