Comparison Overview

Museums In the Park

VS

National Sporting Library & Museum

Museums In the Park

740 East 56th Place, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60637
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://museumsinthepark.org

Museums In the Park (MIP) is a coalition of Chicago museums located on Chicago Park District property. MIP works with the Chicago Park District, Chicago Public Schools, the City of Chicago, the State of Illinois and other entities to build greater awareness of the intrinsic value of museums. MIP is a 501(c)6, not-for-profit organization.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

National Sporting Library & Museum

P.O. Box 1335, Middleburg, VA, 20118, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nationalsporting.org

The National Sporting Library & Museum (NSLM) in Middleburg, Virginia, is dedicated to preserving, promoting, and sharing the literature, art, and culture of equestrian, angling, and field sports. Founded as the National Sporting Library in 1954, the NSLM has expanded to become a library, research facility and art museum with over 26,000 books and works of art in the collections. The collection is shared through exhibits, lectures, seminars, publications and special events. Many of the programs are free and open to the public. Hours: Thursday-Sunday 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-in-the-park.jpeg
Museums In the Park
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-sporting-library.jpeg
National Sporting Library & Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museums In the Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Sporting Library & Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museums In the Park in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Sporting Library & Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Museums In the Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museums In the Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Sporting Library & Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Sporting Library & Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-in-the-park.jpeg
Museums In the Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-sporting-library.jpeg
National Sporting Library & Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Sporting Library & Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museums In the Park company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Sporting Library & Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museums In the Park company.

In the current year, National Sporting Library & Museum company and Museums In the Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Sporting Library & Museum company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Sporting Library & Museum company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Sporting Library & Museum company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museums In the Park company nor National Sporting Library & Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museums In the Park nor National Sporting Library & Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museums In the Park company nor National Sporting Library & Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

National Sporting Library & Museum company employs more people globally than Museums In the Park company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museums In the Park nor National Sporting Library & Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor National Sporting Library & Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor National Sporting Library & Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor National Sporting Library & Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor National Sporting Library & Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor National Sporting Library & Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References