Comparison Overview

Museums In the Park

VS

Eisterhold Associates Inc.

Museums In the Park

740 East 56th Place, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60637
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://museumsinthepark.org

Museums In the Park (MIP) is a coalition of Chicago museums located on Chicago Park District property. MIP works with the Chicago Park District, Chicago Public Schools, the City of Chicago, the State of Illinois and other entities to build greater awareness of the intrinsic value of museums. MIP is a 501(c)6, not-for-profit organization.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Eisterhold Associates Inc.

19310 Nw Farley Hampton Rd, Kansas City, Missouri, 64153-2698, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.eisterhold.com

Eisterhold Associates, Inc. (EAI) has created world-class exhibit experiences for regional and national civic institutions for over three decades. Experiential storytelling is our business. EAI is a full-service Exhibit Design firm that provides Master Planning through Contract Administration services and Media Design and Development for museums and other civic and cultural institutions. We have been fortunate to design and develop some of the country’s most popular institutions, including the National Civil Rights Museum in Memphis, TN, the Rosa Parks Museum, in Montgomery, AL; the African American Museum in Philadelphia, the National Museum of the US Army in Ft. Belvoir, VA, and the Harry S. Truman Presidential Library and Museum. We also have experience designing theme park experiences such as the Jurassic Park Discovery Center at Universal Studios Islands of Adventure, and EPCOT Innoventions. We are currently honored to be working on the design of the National Museum of the Marine Corps in Quantico, VA, and the American Museum of Tort Law in Winsted, CT

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-in-the-park.jpeg
Museums In the Park
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eisterhold-associates-inc.jpeg
Eisterhold Associates Inc.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museums In the Park
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Eisterhold Associates Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museums In the Park in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eisterhold Associates Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Museums In the Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museums In the Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Eisterhold Associates Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eisterhold Associates Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museums-in-the-park.jpeg
Museums In the Park
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eisterhold-associates-inc.jpeg
Eisterhold Associates Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museums In the Park company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Eisterhold Associates Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Eisterhold Associates Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museums In the Park company.

In the current year, Eisterhold Associates Inc. company and Museums In the Park company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Eisterhold Associates Inc. company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Eisterhold Associates Inc. company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Eisterhold Associates Inc. company nor Museums In the Park company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museums In the Park company nor Eisterhold Associates Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Eisterhold Associates Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museums In the Park company nor Eisterhold Associates Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Eisterhold Associates Inc. company employs more people globally than Museums In the Park company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Eisterhold Associates Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Eisterhold Associates Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Eisterhold Associates Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Eisterhold Associates Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Eisterhold Associates Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museums In the Park nor Eisterhold Associates Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References