Comparison Overview

Museum of Freemasonry

VS

The Fairfield Foundation

Museum of Freemasonry

60 Great Queen Street, None, London, England, GB, WC2B 5AZ
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Many people have heard of freemasonry. Most have no idea what it actually involves. At the Museum of Freemasonry, our goal is to help you learn about freemasonry in all its cultural richness. If you’re a freemason, the museum is a treasure trove for exploration. If you’re not a freemason, it’s the perfect place to visit and discover what freemasonry is all about. Our exhibitions and events illuminate the history of freemasonry, explore its traditions and values, and reveal its significance through the ages and around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Fairfield Foundation

P.O. Bos 157, White Marsh, 23183, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Established in 2000, the Fairfield Foundation is an organization dedicated to archaeological research and public outreach focused on Fairfield Plantation, the historic home of the Burwell family in Gloucester County. Over the last decade we established innovative, nationally-recognized educational programming, developed a dedicated corps of volunteers who have donated over 35,000 hours to our cause, and documented one of the most dynamic colonial landscapes in Virginia. In 2010, we purchased the Edge Hill Service Station to serve as our future headquarters and preservation center. This new location will enable us to carry out our mission for the next ten years and beyond- expanding our role across the Middle Peninsula, helping property owners, educational institutions, and local governments preserve and learn from their historical resources, ensuring they survive for future generations to appreciate and enjoy.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumfreemasonry.jpeg
Museum of Freemasonry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The Fairfield Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Freemasonry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Fairfield Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Freemasonry in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Fairfield Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Museum of Freemasonry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Freemasonry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Fairfield Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Fairfield Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumfreemasonry.jpeg
Museum of Freemasonry
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
The Fairfield Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Fairfield Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Freemasonry company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Fairfield Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Freemasonry company.

In the current year, The Fairfield Foundation company and Museum of Freemasonry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Fairfield Foundation company nor Museum of Freemasonry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Fairfield Foundation company nor Museum of Freemasonry company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Fairfield Foundation company nor Museum of Freemasonry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry company nor The Fairfield Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor The Fairfield Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry company nor The Fairfield Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Freemasonry company employs more people globally than The Fairfield Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor The Fairfield Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor The Fairfield Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor The Fairfield Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor The Fairfield Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor The Fairfield Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor The Fairfield Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X