Comparison Overview

Museum of Freemasonry

VS

NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)

Museum of Freemasonry

60 Great Queen Street, None, London, England, GB, WC2B 5AZ
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://museumfreemasonry.org.uk

Many people have heard of freemasonry. Most have no idea what it actually involves. At the Museum of Freemasonry, our goal is to help you learn about freemasonry in all its cultural richness. If you’re a freemason, the museum is a treasure trove for exploration. If you’re not a freemason, it’s the perfect place to visit and discover what freemasonry is all about. Our exhibitions and events illuminate the history of freemasonry, explore its traditions and values, and reveal its significance through the ages and around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)

750 Marguerite Drive, Winston-Salem, NC, US, 27106
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://ncmawinstonsalem.gov/

The North Carolina Museum of Art, Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) offers a front row seat to the art of our time through exhibitions, experiences, and education programs with a focus on regional working artists. Founded in 1956 and located on the scenic James G. Hanes estate, NCMA Winston-Salem offers unique large-scale indoor and outdoor settings for exploring the intersections of contemporary art and culture. NCMA Winston-Salem is a division of the NC Department of Natural & Cultural Resources. Additional funding is provided by the James G. Hanes Memorial Fund and private donations.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumfreemasonry.jpeg
Museum of Freemasonry
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ncmawinstonsalem.jpeg
NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Freemasonry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Freemasonry in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of Freemasonry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Freemasonry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumfreemasonry.jpeg
Museum of Freemasonry
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ncmawinstonsalem.jpeg
NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Museum of Freemasonry company and NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Freemasonry company.

In the current year, NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company and Museum of Freemasonry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company nor Museum of Freemasonry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company nor Museum of Freemasonry company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company nor Museum of Freemasonry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry company nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry company nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Museum of Freemasonry company and NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor NCMA Winston-Salem (formerly SECCA) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References