Comparison Overview

Museum of Freemasonry

VS

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania

Museum of Freemasonry

60 Great Queen Street, None, London, England, GB, WC2B 5AZ
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Many people have heard of freemasonry. Most have no idea what it actually involves. At the Museum of Freemasonry, our goal is to help you learn about freemasonry in all its cultural richness. If you’re a freemason, the museum is a treasure trove for exploration. If you’re not a freemason, it’s the perfect place to visit and discover what freemasonry is all about. Our exhibitions and events illuminate the history of freemasonry, explore its traditions and values, and reveal its significance through the ages and around the world.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania

100 E. Northwestern Ave, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19118, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania is a historic public garden and educational institution. It promotes an understanding of the relationship between plants, people and place through programs that integrate science, art and the humanities. The Arboretum conducts four major activities: education, research, outreach, and horticultural display. As the official Arboretum of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Morris Arboretum of the University of Pennsylvania provides research and outreach services to state agencies, community institutions and to citizens of Pennsylvania and beyond.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumfreemasonry.jpeg
Museum of Freemasonry
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-arboretum-of-the-univ.jpeg
Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Freemasonry
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Freemasonry in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of Freemasonry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Freemasonry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museumfreemasonry.jpeg
Museum of Freemasonry
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-arboretum-of-the-univ.jpeg
Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of Freemasonry company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Freemasonry company.

In the current year, Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company and Museum of Freemasonry company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company nor Museum of Freemasonry company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company nor Museum of Freemasonry company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company nor Museum of Freemasonry company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry company nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Museum of Freemasonry company.

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company employs more people globally than Museum of Freemasonry company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Freemasonry nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H