Comparison Overview

Museum of Ventura County

VS

History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)

Museum of Ventura County

100 East Main Street, Ventura, CA, 93003, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Museum of Ventura County engages participants in meaningful experiences with history, art, culture, and each other by aspiring to spark curiosity and encourage compassion to build community and connection. The Museum of Ventura County first opened in 1913 in the newly built Ventura County Courthouse (now Ventura City Hall). Soon known as the Pioneer Museum, its collections of artifacts and curios were the legacy of Dr. Cephas Bard, a Pennsylvania doctor who came to Ventura after the Civil War. A compassionate man with wide-ranging interests, Dr. Bard accepted historical objects in lieu of cash payment for his services. Priceless Chumash, Spanish and Mexican-American objects from his collection are on display in the galleries today. In 1977, the Museum moved to its 15,000 square foot building on Ventura’s Main Street, near historic Mission San Buenaventura. In 1978, it became an independent nonprofit, no longer receiving operating support from the County of Ventura. In July 2010, our Phase One expansion opened with a New Plaza facing onto Main Street, the state-of-the-art Martin V. and Martha K. Smith Pavilion, a renovated lobby, parking lot, and new landscaping. In September of 2011, our new Museum of Ventura County Agriculture Museum opened to the public in nearby Santa Paula. With permanent and changing exhibitions, programs and events, the Agriculture Museum celebrates the long and innovative agricultural history of our region. Over 50,000 individuals per year enjoy the Museum’s exhibitions, Research Library, tours, special programs, and events.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)

159 Brattle St., Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, 02138
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Here in Cambridge, we don’t do history for history’s sake. It isn’t enough to present history as events that happened. We need to dig deeper, and answer “so what?” and “who cares?” Our humanities-focused approach to tackling contemporary issues through conversation and perspective-taking is one we’re proud of. History Cambridge was originally founded as Cambridge Historical Society in 1905. In 2021 we took a new direction and reinvented ourselves with a new name and a new mission: We engage with our city to explore how the past influences the present in order to shape a better future. Make history with us.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-ventura-county.jpeg
Museum of Ventura County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/history-cambridge.jpeg
History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of Ventura County
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Ventura County in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of Ventura County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Ventura County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-ventura-county.jpeg
Museum of Ventura County
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/history-cambridge.jpeg
History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Museum of Ventura County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of Ventura County company.

In the current year, History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company and Museum of Ventura County company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company nor Museum of Ventura County company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company nor Museum of Ventura County company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company nor Museum of Ventura County company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of Ventura County company nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of Ventura County nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of Ventura County company nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of Ventura County company employs more people globally than History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of Ventura County nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of Ventura County nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of Ventura County nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of Ventura County nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of Ventura County nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of Ventura County nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N