Comparison Overview

Museum of the City of New York

VS

Historic Hudson Valley

Museum of the City of New York

1220 Fifth Avenue, New York, 10029, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

The Museum of the City of New York celebrates and interprets the city, educating the public about its distinctive character, especially its heritage of diversity, opportunity, and perpetual transformation. Founded in 1923 as a private, nonprofit corporation, the Museum connects the past, present, and future of New York City. It serves the people of New York and visitors from around the world through exhibitions, school and public programs, publications, and collections.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 172
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Historic Hudson Valley

639 Bedford Rd, Tarrytown, New York, 10591, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

Historic Hudson Valley, Westchester County’s largest cultural organization, educates and entertains more than 300,000 visitors a year through school programs, tours of five National Historic Landmarks, and large-scale events like The Great Jack O’Lantern Blaze. From our lower Hudson Valley base of operations, we focus on delivering quality educational and entertaining experiences, striking a balance between tradition and vision, from preserving the past, to contextualizing it for 21st-century audiences. Historic Hudson Valley operates tours and public programming at Kykuit, the Rockefeller estate, Philipsburg Manor, Union Church, Washington Irving’s Sunnyside, and Van Cortlandt Manor. These sites help us make meaning for visitors in a variety of settings, including traditional house and landscape tours, formal educational programs for school children, popular on-site special events, and digital media.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 105
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-the-city-of-new-york.jpeg
Museum of the City of New York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-hudson-valley.jpeg
Historic Hudson Valley
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of the City of New York
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Historic Hudson Valley
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of the City of New York in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Historic Hudson Valley in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of the City of New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of the City of New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Historic Hudson Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Historic Hudson Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-the-city-of-new-york.jpeg
Museum of the City of New York
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/historic-hudson-valley.jpeg
Historic Hudson Valley
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Museum of the City of New York company and Historic Hudson Valley company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Historic Hudson Valley company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of the City of New York company.

In the current year, Historic Hudson Valley company and Museum of the City of New York company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Historic Hudson Valley company nor Museum of the City of New York company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Historic Hudson Valley company nor Museum of the City of New York company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Historic Hudson Valley company nor Museum of the City of New York company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of the City of New York company nor Historic Hudson Valley company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Historic Hudson Valley holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of the City of New York company nor Historic Hudson Valley company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Museum of the City of New York company employs more people globally than Historic Hudson Valley company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Historic Hudson Valley holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Historic Hudson Valley holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Historic Hudson Valley holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Historic Hudson Valley holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Historic Hudson Valley holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Historic Hudson Valley holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H