Comparison Overview

Museum of the City of New York

VS

Detroit Institute of Arts

Museum of the City of New York

1220 Fifth Avenue, New York, 10029, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

The Museum of the City of New York celebrates and interprets the city, educating the public about its distinctive character, especially its heritage of diversity, opportunity, and perpetual transformation. Founded in 1923 as a private, nonprofit corporation, the Museum connects the past, present, and future of New York City. It serves the people of New York and visitors from around the world through exhibitions, school and public programs, publications, and collections.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 172
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Detroit Institute of Arts

5200 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI, 48203, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 850 and 899

Home to the first van Gogh painting to enter a U.S. museum (Self-Portrait, 1887) and to Diego Rivera's Detroit Industry Murals (1932-33), the Detroit Institute of Arts is known for its quality, range, and depth of collection. The DIA is a gathering place, and strives to create experiences that help each visitor find personal meaning with the art, both individually and with each other. With an expansive collection of over 65,000 works, the DIA has something for everyone. Share your moments with #DIADetroit. Using a visitor-centered approach to add context to art, the DIA is not just for scholars and art aficionados. Whether a painting brings out a smile or chuckle, or a sculpture leads to deep contemplation, the DIA has a passion for connection through its collection. It takes humans to truly bring art to life. Each team member—from environmental services to accounting and curatorial—brings unique skills that directly contribute to the DIA’s mission. Team members are the heart of the DIA and are a vital role in the museum’s goal to be one of the world’s most visitor-friendly museums. Macomb, Oakland, and Wayne county residents enjoy free general admission.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 432
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-the-city-of-new-york.jpeg
Museum of the City of New York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/detroit-institute-of-arts.jpeg
Detroit Institute of Arts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Museum of the City of New York
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Detroit Institute of Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of the City of New York in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Detroit Institute of Arts in 2026.

Incident History — Museum of the City of New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of the City of New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Detroit Institute of Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Detroit Institute of Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/museum-of-the-city-of-new-york.jpeg
Museum of the City of New York
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/detroit-institute-of-arts.jpeg
Detroit Institute of Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Detroit Institute of Arts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Museum of the City of New York company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Detroit Institute of Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Museum of the City of New York company.

In the current year, Detroit Institute of Arts company and Museum of the City of New York company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Detroit Institute of Arts company nor Museum of the City of New York company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Detroit Institute of Arts company nor Museum of the City of New York company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Detroit Institute of Arts company nor Museum of the City of New York company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Museum of the City of New York company nor Detroit Institute of Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Detroit Institute of Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Museum of the City of New York company nor Detroit Institute of Arts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Detroit Institute of Arts company employs more people globally than Museum of the City of New York company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Detroit Institute of Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Detroit Institute of Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Detroit Institute of Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Detroit Institute of Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Detroit Institute of Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Museum of the City of New York nor Detroit Institute of Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H